Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris and gender"
(Created page with "==Is this necessary?== We've already got pages on Chris and sex, the Tomgirl saga, and homos. All three deal with gender in some fashion. While I think it would be a good idea...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Is this necessary?== | ==Is this necessary?== | ||
We've already got pages on Chris and sex, the Tomgirl saga, and homos. All | We've already got pages on Chris and sex, the Tomgirl saga, and homos. The page on JERKS already says everything about what Chris thinks about men. All these pages already deal with gender in some fashion. While I think it would be a good idea to have the issue of gender addressed in a centralized place, why not just restructure one of these other pages? There's already a "Chris and transgender issues" section on the Homos page. | ||
What's more, the discussions on the Forum indicate that there is a huge debate about Chris and gender which make this a difficult issue to tackle objectively. One of the central rules of the CWCki is to avoid speculation. Chris hasn't received a psychological evaluation on this issue. So far this article has no citations. I am not optimistic about this page not descending into a useless clusterfuck. [[User:Asperhes|asperhes]], 4/5/15 | |||
Revision as of 22:53, 5 April 2015
Is this necessary?
We've already got pages on Chris and sex, the Tomgirl saga, and homos. The page on JERKS already says everything about what Chris thinks about men. All these pages already deal with gender in some fashion. While I think it would be a good idea to have the issue of gender addressed in a centralized place, why not just restructure one of these other pages? There's already a "Chris and transgender issues" section on the Homos page.
What's more, the discussions on the Forum indicate that there is a huge debate about Chris and gender which make this a difficult issue to tackle objectively. One of the central rules of the CWCki is to avoid speculation. Chris hasn't received a psychological evaluation on this issue. So far this article has no citations. I am not optimistic about this page not descending into a useless clusterfuck. asperhes, 4/5/15