Difference between revisions of "Talk:$50 for a video holiday greeting!"
m |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Ugh. You are being far too reasonable and insufficiently tongue in cheek. Honestly, I adore DuskDawn. It was a bad paragraph, and it should have either been fixed or deleted. But it really is a bad precedent to start deleting things because they are "liberal-friendly" or "conservative-friendly". I'll try to fix the original so that it better reflects the glory of the second comeuppance of the holy pilgrimage to cathay. [[User:Yolo Ohno|Yolo Ohno]] ([[User talk:Yolo Ohno|talk]]) 08:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | Ugh. You are being far too reasonable and insufficiently tongue in cheek. Honestly, I adore DuskDawn. It was a bad paragraph, and it should have either been fixed or deleted. But it really is a bad precedent to start deleting things because they are "liberal-friendly" or "conservative-friendly". I'll try to fix the original so that it better reflects the glory of the second comeuppance of the holy pilgrimage to cathay. [[User:Yolo Ohno|Yolo Ohno]] ([[User talk:Yolo Ohno|talk]]) 08:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
You are a thundering faggot, Yolo. Sorry I didn't see this earlier. Try to use logic next time, retard. You shouldn't say "thankfully, he won't vote for Trump" for the same reason you shouldn't say "thankfully, he will vote for Trump." --[[User:DawnDusk|DawnDusk]] ([[User talk:DawnDusk|talk]]) 22:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:08, 10 March 2017
Please, please do not shoehorn political opinions into this article. Trump is a polarizing figure, but let's stay neutral. I already removed one such liberal-friendly line. --DawnDusk (talk) 00:07, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
It seems like you are injecting your political opinions in the article: "liberal-friendly line"? Donald Trump? Short-fingered vulgarian Donald J. Trump is the CWC of political candidates--neither conservative nor liberal, neither republican nor democrat: he is the candidate of morons. The fact that even CWC is not stupid enough to vote for him is a small needle of hope in the haystack of despair. Getting your panties in a twist about the honesty of a mention of Donald J. Trump's absurdity--in fact, skipping any opportunity to disparage the human troll doll is Political Correctness gone completely out of control, and does not belong on the CWCWiki. Yolo Ohno (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
How the fuck is that 'political correctness'? --Boomhauer (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Political Correctness means what it means: The avoidance of words or discussion out of respect for the feelings of other people; not what you believe it means. In this case, information about CWC regarding Trump was censured because someone mistakenly believed it would hurt the feelings of conservatives. What we have here is nothing more than a SJW for the Right. And politics should not be involved in editing the CWCki Yolo Ohno (talk) 21:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
I don't agree with DawnDusk, but you're just using buzzwords. You don't like him, I get it, but don't go blaming the 'sjw tumblr boogeyman'. If it bothers you that much, just undo his change and leave it at that. --Boomhauer (talk) 23:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Ugh. You are being far too reasonable and insufficiently tongue in cheek. Honestly, I adore DuskDawn. It was a bad paragraph, and it should have either been fixed or deleted. But it really is a bad precedent to start deleting things because they are "liberal-friendly" or "conservative-friendly". I'll try to fix the original so that it better reflects the glory of the second comeuppance of the holy pilgrimage to cathay. Yolo Ohno (talk) 08:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
You are a thundering faggot, Yolo. Sorry I didn't see this earlier. Try to use logic next time, retard. You shouldn't say "thankfully, he won't vote for Trump" for the same reason you shouldn't say "thankfully, he will vote for Trump." --DawnDusk (talk) 22:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)