Difference between revisions of "Talk:Da Update (CWC-ism)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*I think maybe we should just make this page into a definition of what "Da Update" is, defined, and then have a notice to consult the CWChronology for the latest updates. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 01:19, 4 July 2009 (CEST) | *I think maybe we should just make this page into a definition of what "Da Update" is, defined, and then have a notice to consult the CWChronology for the latest updates. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 01:19, 4 July 2009 (CEST) | ||
:*Agreed. Do it to it. [[User:Llort|Llort]] 01:32, 4 July 2009 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 18:32, 3 July 2009
16 March 2006
I deleted it because considering the account was created yesterday, I'm guessing it's not the real panda. If it is, I'd like to see some proof of it. --Champthom 15:00, 16 March 2009 (CET)
Da duplicate
Suggestion: Redirect this page to 2009 so we don't have to update 3 pages (including the template) every time something happens. Axe 14:25, 2 May 2009 (CEST)
- I think maybe we should just make this page into a definition of what "Da Update" is, defined, and then have a notice to consult the CWChronology for the latest updates. --Champthom 01:19, 4 July 2009 (CEST)
- Agreed. Do it to it. Llort 01:32, 4 July 2009 (CEST)