Difference between revisions of "Talk:Family Guy"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself.  Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy.  The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of.  If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight.  Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009
I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself.  Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy.  The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of.  If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight.  Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. [[User:Manwithoutabody|Manwithoutabody]] 12:46, 13 September 2009
*I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (*cough*southpark*cough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
*I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (*cough*southpark*cough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--[[User:Goatselover|Goatselover]] 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
*:I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor.  I think potshots at the show balance out with approving references made on other pages.  The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. [[User:Ensign disposable|Ensign disposable]] 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)

Revision as of 23:33, 17 October 2009

To do

  • things from Family Guy Chris has ripped off
    • Seriously, we need to do this, guis. --Champthom 23:41, 3 April 2009 (CEST)
  • his "skit" for Seth MacFarlane

Controversy

Added a small section. It's baseline for now but since we should be informative of the topic and hand and it's relevance to chris; I thought it needed to be added. If anyone can improve it please do so. IJustDontCareAnymore 05:40, 17 April 2009 (CEST)

Just add all the times he referenced it in his comic and IRL.

A Proposal

I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. Manwithoutabody 12:46, 13 September 2009

  • I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (*cough*southpark*cough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--Goatselover 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
    I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots at the show balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. Ensign disposable 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)