Difference between revisions of "Talk:Family Guy"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
***Oh god, it'd be longer than the list on the [[Excel Saga]] article. --[[User:Lime|Lime]] ([[User_talk:Lime|Scold?]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lime|Undo?]]) 03:56, 4 April 2009 (CEST) | ***Oh god, it'd be longer than the list on the [[Excel Saga]] article. --[[User:Lime|Lime]] ([[User_talk:Lime|Scold?]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lime|Undo?]]) 03:56, 4 April 2009 (CEST) | ||
*his "skit" for Seth MacFarlane | *his "skit" for Seth MacFarlane | ||
** Don't forget "Sammy". -- | ** Don't forget "Sammy". -- [[User:Straha|Straha]] | ||
*add stuff from his new video, like his plot idea and his drawings and shit. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 09:52, 10 December 2009 (CET) | *add stuff from his new video, like his plot idea and his drawings and shit. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 09:52, 10 December 2009 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 12:50, 11 December 2009
To do
- things from Family Guy Chris has ripped off
- Seriously, we need to do this, guis. --Champthom 23:41, 3 April 2009 (CEST)
- Oh god, it'd be longer than the list on the Excel Saga article. --Lime (Scold? | Undo?) 03:56, 4 April 2009 (CEST)
- Seriously, we need to do this, guis. --Champthom 23:41, 3 April 2009 (CEST)
- his "skit" for Seth MacFarlane
- Don't forget "Sammy". -- Straha
- add stuff from his new video, like his plot idea and his drawings and shit. --Champthom 09:52, 10 December 2009 (CET)
Controversy
Added a small section. It's baseline for now but since we should be informative of the topic and hand and it's relevance to chris; I thought it needed to be added. If anyone can improve it please do so. IJustDontCareAnymore 05:40, 17 April 2009 (CEST)
Just add all the times he referenced it in his comic and IRL.
A Proposal
I think this page would be funnier if it adopted a more value-neutral attitude to the show itself. Many people other than Christian enjoy Family Guy. The reason I like this site better than ED is that here, we generally stay focused on making fun of Chris alone, rather than everything we can think of. If we had a more neutral description of Family Guy on this page, it might help the overall tone of the sight. Just a thought, so feel free to shout me down if the rest of the populace doesn't agree. Manwithoutabody 12:46, 13 September 2009
- I agree wholeheartedly. I for one like Family Guy and find the show to be a hell of a lot better than other animated sitcoms as of late (*cough*southpark*cough*). That might be a biased opinion, but I think that this article should remain neutral like most other articles about media that Chris rips off.--Goatselover 02:07, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
- I like Family Guy but I'm not above mocking its more dubious ways of conducting its humor. I think potshots at the show balance out with approving references made on other pages. The same goes with basically every other property we've mentioned, I think, save those which are unarguably awful e.g. Filmation's Ghostbusters. Ensign disposable 06:33, 18 October 2009 (CEST)
- I second Ensign disposable's comment. To add to it, while I enjoy Family Guy, the criticisms the show gets in the CWCki article are those that have parallels to the ones CWC gets shit about (originality, etc) and the comparisons are made for humorous effect. I think the article would be fairly bland if they weren't there. Alteceastlansing 05:08, 19 October 2009 (CEST)