Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 10"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Nope. It's from Mailbag 4. I already added it, and a note about the Jack Thaddeus Call.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 04:04, 7 December 2009 (CET) | Nope. It's from Mailbag 4. I already added it, and a note about the Jack Thaddeus Call.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 04:04, 7 December 2009 (CET) | ||
:No wait, he just added it to mailbag 10. It's like he's playing Fucking Hot potato with E-mails.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 04:07, 7 December 2009 (CET) | |||
--- | --- | ||
Revision as of 22:07, 6 December 2009
Rejected, answered, deleted
I think this *might* go here. Could somebody who's been paying more attention check?
| From: David Crass <crasscrab@gmail.com>
Dear Chris Why is Rosechu so useless? It's like she's some sort of classical feminine trope. The only time she has ever actually done anything was when she sexually assaulted Jason Kendrick Howell. I don't know how you see it, but as far as I can tell, Rosechu is little more than a sex object. I mean, all she seems to do through most of the comic is hang on Sonichu, take nude pictures of herself, and get kidnapped. Care to explain how exactly it is that you preach women's rights while at the same time falling back on classic female caricatures? Sincerly, David Crass PS: Your plots seem to be getting more and more convoluted and unnessarily complicated, with nothing ever tying together and a myriad of new characters being introduced and retconned, only to play no real role within the overall plot. |
| She is not useless, sure she has gotten captured, but she is quite excellent in the offense and defense too. Plus, look at Amy Rose; she is not useless, yet she gets captured sometimes too. She is not just a sex object; she is an individual with her own feelings, aspirations and opinions. More of her character will show in later pages.
Maybe they are not the main character at the time, but they do serve their purpose overall. --ChrisChanSonichu 05:30, 5 December 2009 (CET) |
--Anaconda 03:46, 7 December 2009 (CET)
Nope. It's from Mailbag 4. I already added it, and a note about the Jack Thaddeus Call.--Beat 04:04, 7 December 2009 (CET)
- No wait, he just added it to mailbag 10. It's like he's playing Fucking Hot potato with E-mails.--Beat 04:07, 7 December 2009 (CET)
---
Just getting this page up and ready to edit. --Sack Thaddic 07:23, 5 December 2009 (CET)
Hey fuckingstupid,
You're like the resize king. Could you please work your magic on the asperchu image?
There's also a bunch of related images in this /cwc/ thread.
Thanks a lot man.--Beat 03:08, 6 December 2009 (CET)
- HERE YOU GO FUCKERS...
--Fuckingstupid 11:09, 6 December 2009 (CET)