Difference between revisions of "User:PsychoNerd054/DMs with Larry"
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Are you suggesting we remove the policy for that?}} | Are you suggesting we remove the policy for that?}} | ||
{{quoteboxgreen|It's my suggestion. | |||
Again its because of that and most other communities know who Fiona is now. | |||
This isn't like the Wallflower, who pretty much begged Cogsdev to redact her identity before the wider public knew it.}} | |||
{{quotebox|The Suitress thing was basically set up around the time when interest in Fiona was relatively low too, TBH. | |||
Before she set up her AMA}} | |||
{{quoteboxgreen|The AMA suggests the Suitress isn't like the Wallflower, who wants to be completely left alone.}} | |||
{{quotebox|I've always been conflicted about keeping it up, actually. | |||
One one hand, she wants attention. | |||
It'd probably be better for her if she doesn't have her name on there. | |||
On the other hand, it really isn't like the Wallflower, who wanted no attention. | |||
I believe the Bella ban on the server itself was also a reason why KF users were suspicious, tbh.}} | |||
{{Notes}} | {{Notes}} | ||
Revision as of 16:05, 4 June 2025
| Back To Personal Library |
Below are a set of DMs I have had with fellow editor Larry the Larryhog.
Grace Period
19 September 2021
After Larry expressed concerns about users in the ILJ subforum going after members of the CWCki server, partially attributing it to the implementation of the Suitress Policy, I decided to talk to him about the policy.
| Because I feel this is a serious issue, and I saw your suggestion on the CWCki, I feel we should talk it out here.
It's about the Suitress policy |
| Right, as we saw in Kiwi Farms' Bella subforum, users were accusing the Cwcki community for being in cahoot with Bella.
This was before Hurtful's sockpuppeting. |
| I kind of had to say he was sockpuppeting too. |
| The Suitress rule is a major reason for this accusation. |
| I'd imagine.
That's why I wanted to talk to you about it through a DM. I'm jumping back and forth between the CWCki and KF. |
| When the thread accusing our Discord server was made, we lost a good amount of users.
People are actually really afraid of Kiwi Farms, Null's comparison to the Eye of Sauron really resonates. |
| It does.
I've tried to clear it out why the policy was set up, but I wasn't aware this was happening.[note 1] It was because Fiona was seemingly pretty vulnerable. I've only now realized how true that "Eye of Sauron" thing really is. Are you suggesting we remove the policy for that? |
| It's my suggestion.
Again its because of that and most other communities know who Fiona is now. This isn't like the Wallflower, who pretty much begged Cogsdev to redact her identity before the wider public knew it. |
| The Suitress thing was basically set up around the time when interest in Fiona was relatively low too, TBH.
Before she set up her AMA |
| The AMA suggests the Suitress isn't like the Wallflower, who wants to be completely left alone. |
| I've always been conflicted about keeping it up, actually.
One one hand, she wants attention. It'd probably be better for her if she doesn't have her name on there. On the other hand, it really isn't like the Wallflower, who wanted no attention. I believe the Bella ban on the server itself was also a reason why KF users were suspicious, tbh. |