Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 29"
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
I'm still shaking my head in disbelief at Chris's revisions of (and non-answers to) all three of the "5 worst" questions. He seems to be implying that all movies and TV shows that he's ever watched (and all video games that he's ever played) have been good... as if he's far too wise to have ever wasted time on any movie, TV show, or video game that would've been unworthy of his attention. [[User:Llort|Llort]] 07:27, 1 January 2010 (CET) | I'm still shaking my head in disbelief at Chris's revisions of (and non-answers to) all three of the "5 worst" questions. He seems to be implying that all movies and TV shows that he's ever watched (and all video games that he's ever played) have been good... as if he's far too wise to have ever wasted time on any movie, TV show, or video game that would've been unworthy of his attention. [[User:Llort|Llort]] 07:27, 1 January 2010 (CET) | ||
:*What pisses me off? Four of those 5 worst movies all have homosexual undertones in them. What the hell is he thinking putting down Krull, of all movies? Oh, sure, it probably isn't the best (I haven't seen it in ages, but I still love the weapon!), but still...! | :*What pisses me off? Four of those 5 worst movies all have homosexual undertones in them. Big whoop. "Chris is ''STUH-RAIGHT!''" crap again. What the hell is he thinking putting down Krull, of all movies? Oh, sure, it probably isn't the best (I haven't seen it in ages, but I still love the weapon!), but still...!--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 07:32, 1 January 2010 (CET) |
Revision as of 01:32, 1 January 2010
Why, hello there, let me get back to you on that.--Beat 16:19, 31 December 2009 (CET)
- I love the idea of this mailbag, but isn't it problematic to re-post the Evan e-mail when Chris and Evan actually have had further correspondence since then? Llort 17:01, 31 December 2009 (CET)
- I don't see why we should skip the opportunity to have Chris whine about something. Besides, he's in a rush to answer those questions. I guess it's less "stressful" to answers questions with one-liners than drawing his crappy comic or ending his Christmas story. So I have no problem with out-of-sync (or even repeated) inquiries. Griffintown 17:21, 31 December 2009 (CET)
Y'know, I think it's funny that this is the second time Chris has called out someone using a popular name. What I think would be even more hilarious? If someone from the comic or game industry DID call out to Chris on this, he called them a troll and then he was forced to put his tugboat where his mouth is.
Wishful thinking, I know, but still...!--Blazer 00:24, 1 January 2010 (CET)
- The guy literally said he was from the comic industry. If he would have said he was an avearge joe Chris probably would have responded "Whatever".--Sonichuistehcool 01:37, 1 January 2010 (CET)
The Bear
The link to where Chris advises someone to watch that 1967 bear-related acid trip is broken and I'm not sure how to fix it. --Anaconda 00:28, 1 January 2010 (CET)
- Apparently the Reply templates really hate external links. I have no idea why.--Beat 01:49, 1 January 2010 (CET)
Whatever
Wow, Chris is a total dick. Also, I fear that my titles for the "Whatever" e-mails are not EPIC enough. If someone can come up with more EPIC titles, that would be awesome.--Beat 00:40, 1 January 2010 (CET)
- Well, I think Chris's Sysop should re-issue those questions. Whatever is not a valid answer for me. Griffintown 05:25, 1 January 2010 (CET)
- YES! She fucking better! --CWCAttack 05:54, 1 January 2010 (CET)
New gal-pal's influence?
I wonder if his recent JERKitude has anything to do with whoever put him up to the juggalo thing? He mentions his "trusted associates," which are always trolls. They could have informed him that some emails were fake or just told him to google the names. It's more likely than Chris actually learning, anyway. Fenny 02:53, 1 January 2010 (CET)
- I doubt a single gal-pal would influence his change of personality like that. It has to be the surge of gay content, both the ads and the mails, all over his site. Homosexuality may be something Chris hates more than trolls. --CWCAttack 05:54, 1 January 2010 (CET)
Electric Hedgehog biology
First, Sonichu and Rosechu are different species, but in the Pokemon sense. Second, a 3-month gestation with fertility until death means morality is the only thing holding the electric hedgehogs from just churning out babies. Third, the amount of energy required to radiate such electric energy must be astounding. Fourth, their happiness and combat experience are the only limiting factors to reaching sexual maturity. Fifth, their sapience and capacity for individual action independent of trainers means that electric hedgehogs are the single most dangerous things in the world. --OFSheep 04:07, 1 January 2010 (CET)
Five worsts
I'm still shaking my head in disbelief at Chris's revisions of (and non-answers to) all three of the "5 worst" questions. He seems to be implying that all movies and TV shows that he's ever watched (and all video games that he's ever played) have been good... as if he's far too wise to have ever wasted time on any movie, TV show, or video game that would've been unworthy of his attention. Llort 07:27, 1 January 2010 (CET)
- What pisses me off? Four of those 5 worst movies all have homosexual undertones in them. Big whoop. "Chris is STUH-RAIGHT!" crap again. What the hell is he thinking putting down Krull, of all movies? Oh, sure, it probably isn't the best (I haven't seen it in ages, but I still love the weapon!), but still...!--Blazer 07:32, 1 January 2010 (CET)