Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 4"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
**What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET) | **What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET) | ||
***It's not a CWC-ism, the friends zone is, from my understanding, when a woman keeps a man or several men as friends and rejects any of their advances to become lovers. It can apply the other way around as well. Chris is a retard for thinking it's a law or something like that, though. --[[User:GUInterface|GUInterface]] 23:07, 29 November 2009 (CET) | ***It's not a CWC-ism, the friends zone is, from my understanding, when a woman keeps a man or several men as friends and rejects any of their advances to become lovers. It can apply the other way around as well. Chris is a retard for thinking it's a law or something like that, though. --[[User:GUInterface|GUInterface]] 23:07, 29 November 2009 (CET) | ||
:::*To clarify what GUI said, it's the idea that if you're too close a friends with a woman, she'll view you as "just a friend" and therefore not be interested in a sexual relationship because she'll feel like she'd ruin an otherwise good friendship as a result. It's not so much a law but just a good idea - I mean, in some cases, you might be interested in someone and become their friend but you have such a good friendship that you don't want to fuck it up and then lose an otherwise good friend if things don't work out romantically and/or sexually between the two. In other words, Chris's concept of [[Sweetheart from the ground up]] falls apart because of this. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 23:47, 29 November 2009 (CET) | |||
==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.== | ==I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.== | ||
That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET) | That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --[[User:Beat|Beat]] 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 17:47, 29 November 2009
Lol my email got posted :p not telling which one though ;)
He just started answering them. I'll start posting his responses immediately. I can't wait to see how he rationalizes his incredibly corrupt lifestyle to the devout christian 14-year-old.--Beat 04:35, 28 November 2009 (CET)
What the fuck
"I have had this problem too. I would take all such images when they enter my mind and just delete them; I imagine, in my mind, rolling them all into a ball, shrinking it down, and tossing them into a garbage can that links to my Stomach through a direct bodily vein. I imagine the feeling of it falling through the vein and making its splash landing into the stomach acid and dissolving; gone forever"
This needs to be a front page quote. --Beat 05:31, 28 November 2009 (CET)
Seconded. Proof that Chris is a homo.--Sonichuistehcool 17:20, 28 November 2009 (CET)
Redacted
Chris changed one of his lazy HURR I DUNNO answers to something about how he wants to make the Friend Zone illegal. Please watch the CWCipedia mailbag articles for drastic changes until Chris's laziness takes over and he forgets about them. --Anaconda 03:00, 29 November 2009 (CET)
- "I would remove the "Law" of the "Friend Zone", because I feel that it is just wrong to not even attempt to have anything beyond friendship, especially if the man and the woman are both comfortable with each other and are close. --ChrisChanSonichu 00:57, 29 November 2009 (CET)"--Sonichuistehcool 03:51, 29 November 2009 (CET)
- What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --Blazer 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)
- It's not a CWC-ism, the friends zone is, from my understanding, when a woman keeps a man or several men as friends and rejects any of their advances to become lovers. It can apply the other way around as well. Chris is a retard for thinking it's a law or something like that, though. --GUInterface 23:07, 29 November 2009 (CET)
- What the hell is a "Friend Zone"? That's the first time I've ever heard of that! Maybe I'm not into the know with stuff like that, but that sounds like another CWC-ism to me! --Blazer 18:43, 29 November 2009 (CET)
- To clarify what GUI said, it's the idea that if you're too close a friends with a woman, she'll view you as "just a friend" and therefore not be interested in a sexual relationship because she'll feel like she'd ruin an otherwise good friendship as a result. It's not so much a law but just a good idea - I mean, in some cases, you might be interested in someone and become their friend but you have such a good friendship that you don't want to fuck it up and then lose an otherwise good friend if things don't work out romantically and/or sexually between the two. In other words, Chris's concept of Sweetheart from the ground up falls apart because of this. --Champthom 23:47, 29 November 2009 (CET)
I'm gonna add subtitles to the individual messages.
That way we can link to individual e-mails in other articles, making for an easier reading experience or something. --Beat 06:13, 29 November 2009 (CET)