Difference between revisions of "User talk:Briscoe/Chris and Reliability"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thought this would be a good "Chris and..." page. It needs to be expanded and added to [[Template:Chris and]] -[[User:Briscoe|Cody]] 11:32 PM January 4th 2010 | Thought this would be a good "Chris and..." page. It needs to be expanded and added to [[Template:Chris and]] -[[User:Briscoe|Cody]] 11:32 PM January 4th 2010 | ||
* I second this! The world needs to know exactly how unreliable he is. --[[User:CWCAttack|CWCAttack]] 05:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | * I second this! The world needs to know exactly how unreliable he is. --[[User:CWCAttack|CWCAttack]] 05:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
* This is really starting to push it. Srsly, can you think of a better name than "Chris and x"? It's starting to be done to death. Also, can you elaborate what you're aiming for this page? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:43, 5 January 2010
Thought this would be a good "Chris and..." page. It needs to be expanded and added to Template:Chris and -Cody 11:32 PM January 4th 2010
- I second this! The world needs to know exactly how unreliable he is. --CWCAttack 05:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- This is really starting to push it. Srsly, can you think of a better name than "Chris and x"? It's starting to be done to death. Also, can you elaborate what you're aiming for this page? --Champthom 05:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)