Difference between revisions of "Talk:CWC Cums for a Cat"
m |
m |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
There was some debate over whether Chris was recycling in this particular video. Some argue that when he opens the can of soda, he's using it as a chaser for his semen, whereas it's plausible that he's merely thirsty after moaning like a tard which must do a number on his voice. Thoughts on how we should treat this? Or incorporate this debate into the article, in terms of interpretation? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 21:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | There was some debate over whether Chris was recycling in this particular video. Some argue that when he opens the can of soda, he's using it as a chaser for his semen, whereas it's plausible that he's merely thirsty after moaning like a tard which must do a number on his voice. Thoughts on how we should treat this? Or incorporate this debate into the article, in terms of interpretation? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 21:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Its a very real possibility. I say that we make a mention of what could be happening even if we are not sure. Its very likely given what we know about Chris. | *Its a very real possibility. I say that we make a mention of what could be happening even if we are not sure. Its very likely given what we know about Chris. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 22:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 6 February 2010
bluespike was on skype, not actually talking with chris, just typing out shit
this happened right after mumble 7 i believe, after i (meaning clyde) told chris that panda was dead
and then bob walks in plan was thought up of.
then the rest...was history. Clydec 20:48, 22 December 2009 (CET)
Link is dead. Can someone re-up? Wozblod 18:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Recycling
There was some debate over whether Chris was recycling in this particular video. Some argue that when he opens the can of soda, he's using it as a chaser for his semen, whereas it's plausible that he's merely thirsty after moaning like a tard which must do a number on his voice. Thoughts on how we should treat this? Or incorporate this debate into the article, in terms of interpretation? --Champthom 21:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Its a very real possibility. I say that we make a mention of what could be happening even if we are not sure. Its very likely given what we know about Chris. --Edward 22:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)