Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alec Benson Leary calls"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
So ideally, each call is gonna have a brief narrative of what is being discussed - previous calls are referenced, IIRC, so another reason why we need a page. If people want to check out the calls, they can do so by looking at each call's page. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 07:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
So ideally, each call is gonna have a brief narrative of what is being discussed - previous calls are referenced, IIRC, so another reason why we need a page. If people want to check out the calls, they can do so by looking at each call's page. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 07:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
* Not to stick my nose into this, but I can see the validity of both perspectives. I think we should keep the separate page for now and see how it evolves. If it remains as an index with no real detail, I think it should just be merged with [[Asperchu]], and we could refer to the subsection. If it develops an identity of its own, it should stay separate. I can't think of any other series of calls/audios that has its own index page; perhaps the way this page develops could be a precedent for how we deal with the others.
* Not to stick my nose into this, but I can see the validity of both perspectives. I think we should keep the separate page for now and see how it evolves. If it remains as an index with no real detail, I think it should just be merged with [[Asperchu]], and we could refer to the subsection. If it develops an identity of its own, it should stay separate. I can't think of any other series of calls/audios that has its own index page; perhaps the way this page develops could be a precedent for how we deal with the others.
 
*Yeah, that sounds fair. But in theory, this page might not develop because people are too lazy to do anything with it. Just saying. Also, now that I think about it, the Julie PSN chats and the Mumble chats could have an index page. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 18:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
tl;dr: Let's wait and see how it goes. - [[User:Liquid!|Liquid!]] 15:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
tl;dr: Let's wait and see how it goes. - [[User:Liquid!|Liquid!]] 15:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)



Revision as of 13:21, 10 February 2010

Purpose of this page

I disagree with Clyde that there is no validity of having a separate page for calls. I agree that they should be mentioned in Asperchu. However, I think dealing with calls, we need a separate article to establish a narrative for this series of calls - someone should be able to read this page and get a sense of the stringing themes and narrative associated with the calls. Also, just dumping this all in Asperchu detracts the conflict between Asperchu and Chris as opposed to Alec and Chris.

So ideally, each call is gonna have a brief narrative of what is being discussed - previous calls are referenced, IIRC, so another reason why we need a page. If people want to check out the calls, they can do so by looking at each call's page. --Champthom 07:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Not to stick my nose into this, but I can see the validity of both perspectives. I think we should keep the separate page for now and see how it evolves. If it remains as an index with no real detail, I think it should just be merged with Asperchu, and we could refer to the subsection. If it develops an identity of its own, it should stay separate. I can't think of any other series of calls/audios that has its own index page; perhaps the way this page develops could be a precedent for how we deal with the others.
  • Yeah, that sounds fair. But in theory, this page might not develop because people are too lazy to do anything with it. Just saying. Also, now that I think about it, the Julie PSN chats and the Mumble chats could have an index page. --Champthom 18:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

tl;dr: Let's wait and see how it goes. - Liquid! 15:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

hey get the dates

call two took place 1-28-2010 and call seven took place 2-8-2010. i'll get the other dates later i guess Clydec 17:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)