Difference between revisions of "Talk:Emails"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New section: Name)
Line 5: Line 5:
==Da update==
==Da update==
My God...it's beautiful. Not to brag, but for the first time, to my knowledge, the CWC e-mails are in chronological order and in plaintext format. Now to annotate these with blue links and we'll have an actual CWC cordance - you read the e-mails, not sure what something means? Guess what, click a blue link and it'll take you to the article. Also, time to add some images and whatnot to enforce it (like the fanarts that offended him, etc.). Anyways, so help me God, someone screws up (in a bad way) this page, I will go absolutely mad =D. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 03:13, 16 March 2009 (CET)
My God...it's beautiful. Not to brag, but for the first time, to my knowledge, the CWC e-mails are in chronological order and in plaintext format. Now to annotate these with blue links and we'll have an actual CWC cordance - you read the e-mails, not sure what something means? Guess what, click a blue link and it'll take you to the article. Also, time to add some images and whatnot to enforce it (like the fanarts that offended him, etc.). Anyways, so help me God, someone screws up (in a bad way) this page, I will go absolutely mad =D. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 03:13, 16 March 2009 (CET)
== Name ==
Why is this under Chris E-mails, instead of just Emails? Can't it be assumed that emails on CWCki involve Chris? Plus "email" seems to be a more common variation than "e-mail". --[[User:Great Briton|Great Briton]] 20:39, 27 July 2009 (CEST)

Revision as of 13:39, 27 July 2009

To do

It's looking awesome - not now, but slowly. When it's done, it will be a fully annotated version of Chris's e-mails - in chronological order, with annotations so a total n00b could read these and understand everything.

Could someone else help and check to see if everything's in order? I think a few of them might be out of order (that's my fault). But still, when it's done, this is going to be amazing. --Champthom 22:41, 15 March 2009 (CET)

Da update

My God...it's beautiful. Not to brag, but for the first time, to my knowledge, the CWC e-mails are in chronological order and in plaintext format. Now to annotate these with blue links and we'll have an actual CWC cordance - you read the e-mails, not sure what something means? Guess what, click a blue link and it'll take you to the article. Also, time to add some images and whatnot to enforce it (like the fanarts that offended him, etc.). Anyways, so help me God, someone screws up (in a bad way) this page, I will go absolutely mad =D. --Champthom 03:13, 16 March 2009 (CET)

Name

Why is this under Chris E-mails, instead of just Emails? Can't it be assumed that emails on CWCki involve Chris? Plus "email" seems to be a more common variation than "e-mail". --Great Briton 20:39, 27 July 2009 (CEST)