Difference between revisions of "Talk:Laughs Under Lucricities"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Squirrelbait (talk | contribs) m (→TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid": suggesting ludicrous as a root word) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC) | * Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
* I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | * I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went [[slow-in-the-minds|completely over my head]] and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in [[CWC's Second Message]] where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. [[User:Blusko|Blusko]] 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
* I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.[[User:Squirrelbait|Squirrelbait]] 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:39, 12 March 2010
TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid"
Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any case, I really don't think that "lucrid" was derived from "lucid" (meaning "clear"), as this page currently implies. If anything, "lucrid" was derived from "lurid" (meaning "revolting"). Honestly, one of my favorite things about CWCki is how many editors here make fun of Chris's "tenuous grasp on the English language" when they are themselves just barely literate. Llort 15:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in Mailbag 48 and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-Phlegethon 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Edited article to reflect this. --DStecks 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- I wrote the note about 'lucid', the more obvious 'lurid' just went completely over my head and the OP rightfully makes fun of me for it. The lucid thing came about because of the line in CWC's Second Message where he says "drawing such loose—such lucrid mockeries " - the hesitation makes it sound like he is trying to say lucid but can't quite get it right. Blusko 12:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- I've always thought that Chris was going for some form of the word "ludicrous," which means absurdly ridiculous. Perhaps it is a portmanteau of "ludicrous" and "atrocity," since that's what he is.Squirrelbait 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)