Difference between revisions of "Category talk:CWCipedia vandalism"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
While I admire your thoroughness, Pfargtl9000, (seriously!) I would like to question if we really need all these pictures, and I am also pretty sure some of them are duplicates of pictures we already have.--[[User:Blachman|Blachman]] 18:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
While I admire your thoroughness, Pfargtl9000, (seriously!) I would like to question if we really need all these pictures, and I am also pretty sure some of them are duplicates of pictures we already have.--[[User:Blachman|Blachman]] 18:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
*I'm filtering out what we don't need, but keeping the others. A loyal Christorian like Pfargt9000 does need to be recognised. --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 19:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
*I'm filtering out what we don't need, but keeping the others. A loyal Christorian like Pfargt9000 does need to be recognised. --[[User:YawningSquirtleRedux|YawningSquirtleRedux]] 19:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
**Some of the pictures the trolls are putting up are just incredible.  Plus, a lot of these also qualify as Fanart.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 21:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:33, 20 March 2010

While I admire your thoroughness, Pfargtl9000, (seriously!) I would like to question if we really need all these pictures, and I am also pretty sure some of them are duplicates of pictures we already have.--Blachman 18:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

  • I'm filtering out what we don't need, but keeping the others. A loyal Christorian like Pfargt9000 does need to be recognised. --YawningSquirtleRedux 19:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
    • Some of the pictures the trolls are putting up are just incredible. Plus, a lot of these also qualify as Fanart.--Beat 21:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)