Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris and rape"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*I basically just pulled this from the [[Chris and sex]] page and shuffled it a bit, added a header or two and called it done. I'm not stopping you from editing, for sure; I'm much too lazy to do much else. [[User:Lord Snotfolus|Lord Snotfolus]] 01:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | *I basically just pulled this from the [[Chris and sex]] page and shuffled it a bit, added a header or two and called it done. I'm not stopping you from editing, for sure; I'm much too lazy to do much else. [[User:Lord Snotfolus|Lord Snotfolus]] 01:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
*I have similar sentiments. I have a fear that this article could devolve into a typical /cwc/ or PVCC post, which isn't what the CWCki is for. Like all Chris and... articles, we need to stick with the factual, namely that Chris hasn't actually raped someone. I think it only warrants its own article because it's a common topic that arises amongst trolls. | |||
:I'll give it a chance. As for the [[Chris and sex]] article, we need to work a bit about it as just splitting or removing stuff isn't that simple. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 01:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:24, 24 April 2010
Good stuff dude, but my only real qualm is this. First hand accounts (Mimms and Lucas) say that Chris was not particulaly rapist-ish. He was a bit close to Megan, but I don't think that he would rape someone. I certainly don't think if they turned round and yelled/cried at him to stop, he'd force them.
I don't mind recording what he's done, but saying he's a potential rapist is a bit far.
Otherwise, great work --YawningSquirtleRedux 00:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- I basically just pulled this from the Chris and sex page and shuffled it a bit, added a header or two and called it done. I'm not stopping you from editing, for sure; I'm much too lazy to do much else. Lord Snotfolus 01:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- I have similar sentiments. I have a fear that this article could devolve into a typical /cwc/ or PVCC post, which isn't what the CWCki is for. Like all Chris and... articles, we need to stick with the factual, namely that Chris hasn't actually raped someone. I think it only warrants its own article because it's a common topic that arises amongst trolls.
- I'll give it a chance. As for the Chris and sex article, we need to work a bit about it as just splitting or removing stuff isn't that simple. --Champthom 01:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)