Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Eye of Judgment"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:


==Recurring themes!==
==Recurring themes!==
As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game.  Especially when your enemies are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings.  Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? [[User:Ensign disposable|Ensign disposable]] 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)
As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game.  Especially unjustified when most creatures in any of the games he plays are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings.  Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? Even the Pokemon CCG doesn't make a mechanical distinction for male or female beasties. [[User:Ensign disposable|Ensign disposable]] 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

Revision as of 04:19, 29 September 2009

Correction to Title

It's actually titled "The Eye of Judgment", not "The Eye of Judgement". (I actually prefer the latter spelling, but alas, it's incorrect here.) Llort 06:12, 23 May 2009 (CEST)

  • Oh wow, you're right, sorry man. But that doesn't sound like correct english... RachmaninovDESU 16:11, 23 May 2009 (CEST)
  • I've always preferred to spell it judgment, seinor. Axe 09:52, 24 May 2009 (CEST)

In unrelated news...

...Magic: the Gathering - Duels of the Planeswalkers is available on Hex-Box, and unlike most Wizards of the Coast money-fleecing schemes, features no additional purchases. Get one today! (Not a paid advertisement) --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 09:20, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

I've got mine! Ensign disposable 10:11, 29 September 2009 (CEST)

Recurring themes!

As someone else noted, Chris seems to assume that the game has a "male/female monster" division that doesn't exist in the game. Especially unjustified when most creatures in any of the games he plays are a bunch of gender-indistinct monster types or just one example of a race of beings. Who's to say that any given card represents a male or female unless it's a Legendary-equivalent whose character is male or female? Even the Pokemon CCG doesn't make a mechanical distinction for male or female beasties. Ensign disposable 10:14, 29 September 2009 (CEST)