Difference between revisions of "Talk:6 June 2010"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
:*Chris is going to be vat'd, huh? -[[User:Brofose|Brofose]] 10:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
:*Chris is going to be vat'd, huh? -[[User:Brofose|Brofose]] 10:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
::*Probably.  They need to do ''something'' to get the stank out of him. -- [[User:Revolver Octopus|Revolver Octopus]] 10:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
::*Probably.  They need to do ''something'' to get the stank out of him. -- [[User:Revolver Octopus|Revolver Octopus]] 10:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
:::*Still - this is only one version of the events. For all we know he could be exaggerating the entire situation - but I like to think we get the TRUE and HONEST version of events sometimes. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 12:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:23, 7 June 2010

Fool that I am, I think I might actually transcribe this... Dkaien 03:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

  • I will take the second half of DIS BITCH. This is an urge I cannot control. Also what the fuck Chris is fucking stalking Snyder now goddammit.--Beat 03:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I finished it up before I saw your update. I sincerely apologize if you listened to any of this shit unecessarily. Dkaien 04:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • You did a good job! I did do some transcribing before I realized you had finished it, but honestly I needed the practice anyway.--Beat 06:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

To do

Add Michael Synder's comment from YouTube that sparked this (see Da update for it). --Champthom 03:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Rename dis bitch

If a video does not have a proper name, you name it after the date it went up. This should be "6 June 2010". What is so goddamn hard about this?--Beat 04:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Whathisname usually figures out how to treat shit, that's why I named it that. That's why. --Champthom 04:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Now that I know Champ made the page, I feel bad about my first comment.--Beat 06:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I'LL RUN YOU OVER DEAD

This is the second time that we know of that Chris has tried to commit vehicular homicide. I get the feeling that at this rate, he's going to get himself v@ by the end of the year. -- Revolver Octopus 07:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Chris is going to be vat'd, huh? -Brofose 10:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Probably. They need to do something to get the stank out of him. -- Revolver Octopus 10:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Still - this is only one version of the events. For all we know he could be exaggerating the entire situation - but I like to think we get the TRUE and HONEST version of events sometimes. --Anonymax 12:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)