CWCki talk:Banned Users
Page Created
So yeah, Champ asked and I made it. Additions/corrections/etc are more than welcome- I don't recognise many of the names on the list, so feel free to add in more details. I'd recommend we keep it slightly-brief in order to prevent glory seekers/namefags.
Um...
I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --Edward 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed.--Champthom 15:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- I'll do a bit of rewriting now then...Give me just a moment. --Edward 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- All cleaned up now. I've shortened most of the explainations to basic things like harassment and vandalism. I think it looks somewhat tidier now. --Edward 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- At first I was a little upset by the change, but now I like it. It takes up less space now.--trombonista 16:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about the original formatting boss. I figured too much information was better than too little, but I actually like the change too.--Ronichu 17:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Glad to hear that you guys approve. --Edward 17:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
You know...
As a part time wiki vandal (do it on and off on Wikipedia), this will actually encourage people to fuck shit up. Any mention of them, no matter how tiny, will just their ducks bigger. --Espanolic 16:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Probably. But we deal with a lot of vandals anyway, right? --Edward 17:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Should this include Delabonte?
After all, he did get a 6-month ban (28 January 2011). Freecell 11:12, 2 August 2010 (PDT)