Talk:DeviantART
A pedofork drawing?
I didn't get to see CWC's dA soon enough, and am wondering about the pic that Chris was banned for. The poster of this comment leads me to believe that it was some sort of Rosey pantyshot, but the main article calls it the Rosechu washing-machine (maybe facerape?) pic. (If it was the facerape, Rosechu was 18, so it wouldn't have been child porn, although . If it wasn't facerape, then I'd like a better description of the pic.)
Not that I want to see the pic or anything if it is child porn (which disgusts me). However, I would like to know more about this "washing-machine pic," whether or not Cheguevaraplz was right about it/lying/whatever, and (most importantly) whether or not this means that perhaps Chris is a pedofork after all. --Spandam-sama 00:35, 29 August 2009 (CEST)
- The Pantyshot...I don't think the pantyshot is enough to get him banned, but with my understanding of DA's sometimes arcane policies (and observations as a long time Deviantartfag myself), the facerape would DEFINITELY get him banhammered. Plus, probably twenty people reported him. -- Needlepants 00:40, 29 August 2009 (CEST)
- The panty shot wasn't it. If you could be banned for something like that, a lot more people would be gone. The face rape is more likely; but even then one piece being removed, even for something like pornography, isn't enough for a ban. What would have done it was probably a report for a questionable and/or truly against policy piece which informed the admins that this was a ban-evading account. Ban evaders are immediately re-banned when they're discovered. --LizardPie 05:13, 29 August 2009 (CEST)
- For the record: When I saw Cheguevaraplz's comment, I checked Chris's gallery, and lo and behold, the aforementioned washing-machine pantyshot was definitely deleted from the gallery. Of course, one can't say it's the sole reason they banned him. It could have been a factor. I definitely think that the combined fact that Chris admitted to evading a ban in his journal and people flagging his most questionable pictures left and right could have resulted a ban. --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 21:27, 29 August 2009 (CEST)
I myself reported two of his pics, the pantyshot and the escene of blake and bubbles (yes he uploaded that one) and I suggested in the second report to wichever admin read it to make a full check of his gallery in case he uploaded something worse, and the enxt day I received a note form them telling me about hsi banning, here are the notes: http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg186/keihzaru/note1.jpg http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg186/keihzaru/note2.jpg (User talk:keihzaru)
- HE UPLOADED THE SEX SCENE WITH BLAKE AND BUBBLES? WHAT IS WRONG WITH HIM? [/cruise control] Every time I think I've seen it all, he just gets wackier. - Needlepants 04:27, 30 August 2009 (CEST)
Getting Him B&
I don't think immediately trying to get him banned is the best option. He will probably do something to get himself b& (racism, sexism, and homophobia are bannable offenses), and when he does we can take credit. Until then, many lulz will pour from the account. -Skwrr 18:11, 1 November 2009 (CET)
Really?
Do we really need to mock Deviantart? I mean, we're not Encyclopedia Dramatica (thank god for that), as far as this site should be concerned, DeviantART is just an art site on which Chris posts is retarded artwork, not "LULZLULZLULZDRAMA!!!111". --DoctorAwesome
- We're not Wikipedia either and there's content here that would equally offend others even if it's not the point. So in the end, everybody loses. --AntonImausMk2 20:42, 17 December 2009 (CET)