Talk:Asperchu is a Horrendous Joke

From CWCki
Revision as of 22:52, 17 January 2010 by Isarko (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fuck, Chris just made me lose the game. He hasn't done that since 2008. Isarko 08:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Now he's really gone off to be a complete and utter narcissistic bastard. --Hayate666 12:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I shall commence with the TRANSCRIBING of DIS BITCH! Upon reaching minute number five I will quit, because It's fucking late.--Beat 08:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Cool. First 5 are done. There was one point near the beginning I couldn't figure out what the hell he was saying. Also the amount of lying Chris is doing in this video is just amazing.--Beat 09:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Got done with the rest...looks like we finished up at about the same time. Alteceastlansing 09:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Jesus.

Does anyone else find "I hope the soul of my late dog eats at your souls and kills you in your sleep." Really, really disturbing? I mean, even for Chris standards. Jesus Christ.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nafka (talkcontribs)

  • Damn. I take a break from CWC for a single DAY and Chris find a way to dig himself deeper in his own hole... Griffintown 19:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, Patti was his only sympathetic trait, and now even that's gone. Someone needs to point out to Chris that Ian definitely shot Liquid in his comics. Isarko 22:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
    • Done. --Briscoe 22:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

The homosexual references.

When Chris starts talking about the homosexual references in the date episode, at this point in the video transcription:

But I could get- I could definitely reference a few more instances of where he actually is considering peeing on himself within his own comic series. Starting with, of course, with a few from his first book of graphic nudity or sexual reference on page three of his 0 book. Even worse off, on page 10, and while he's in that Burger King! With all his goddamned homosexual references as well! [Chris shuffles through a variety of pages featuring the Asperchu date plot in book one. None of them contain any homosexual references. He then returns to the page select.]

I think he's refering to the New Moon posters in the background that have shirtless and naked guys on them (you can't really see them in the poor camera quality, however). So Chris isn't completely wrong in this respect. Fefnir 20:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Actually, he is wrong. They're male models or something, right? Does that mean they're gay? In Chris's view, a male model in a suggestive pose would constitute "homosexual reference," but he's an idiot. Considering that they're photoshopped into posters for Twilight: New Moon, they're meant for females to gawk at. Chris is, yet again displaying his overactive homophobia.--Jewlay 20:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
  • I transcribed that part, and yeah, I couldn't see any half-naked dudes with Chris's crappy video quality (that and the fact he's fucking filming his TV). My bad dudes. Still, to automatically assume as buff guy is a "homosexual reference" is a bit much.--Beat 20:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

CWCville is real

I think this video cements the theory that CWCville is a real place in Chris's mind. Notice how he is completely serious coming up with a possible explanation for how Sonichu is in the Asperchu comic, and then clarifies that there have been no law changes in CWCville. --Raikonos 21:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

You rage you ruse

This saga has been off to a booming start, and now we have a video even more frustrating than whatever the fuck the video should be called also this whole "former buddha belly" delusion thing has been fucking hilarious! --Briscoe 22:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

  • I never thought it could happen, but Asperchu Saga might actually make Chris ragequit. After watching this and going through Mailbag 41, I think that the explosion of tard-rage might be visible from space. Isarko 03:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Mao's rebuttal

Should we transcribe Mao's rebuttal that calls Chris out on all this bullshit? I mean since Mao does kinda speak kinda low unless the audio's up far enough (or maybe it's just me).

  • Either way, I don't see why not. Just let's not forget Mao's catch phrase in the end of his videos. --CWCAttack 00:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)