User talk:Cleftpalete

From CWCki
Revision as of 18:58, 2 March 2012 by Cleftpalete (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi there!

Welcome to CWCKI!

Welcome to CWCki! There's a lot to do around here because Chris never does anything himself. I hope you'll stay with us and make many improvements of your own!

Before you start, be sure to read A Quick Guide to CWCki. This will guide you through the dos and don'ts of editing the world's most accurate wiki. Be especially sure to read this if you consider Anonymous to be legion or if you've just come over from ED. Everything you know is wrong.
Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.
If you're looking for things to do, check out the priority listing for things that need to be done, or join a project.
If you haven't already, create a user page about yourself! If you do, we'll be able to know you better as a member of our community. Just be sure to check out the guidelines first.
Questions? Please read the FAQ first. Later, you can ask in the Community Portal or on the "discussion" page associated with each article, join the live chat in our IRC channel or post a message on my talk page!
Once again, welcome to CWCki!

--WelcomeBot 19:04, 26 January 2012 (PST)

Dont remove CONTENT

ok im fine with your removal of unfunny BS but do not remove CONTENT like fan videos. The wiki is designed to be funny sarcastic and informative, this is not ED but its not wikipedia either... .-~ Slimz ~-. 05:08, 27 January 2012 (PST)

  • Listen, I like some fan videos too. But some are shitty. And the "Homos" page is probably one of the most relevant pages on the wiki, when there's this big ugly video on a nice page like that I can't not remove it. Also I'm not trying to make it like ED or Wikipedia, I can just read certain pages and tell that spergs wrote them and I want to erase that ugliness. Cleftpalete 12:37, 27 January 2012 (PST)
  • I agree with Cleftpalete here, I often seen videos which are thrown in for the sake of having videos and they really don't add to the article and bog it down. I don't think it's a tremendous loss. --Champthom 04:27, 18 February 2012 (PST)

Keep it up and don't listen to Slimz

You're doing the Lord's work here Cleftpalete. I have a feeling that you and I are going to get along just fine. --Old meme 06:35, 27 January 2012 (PST)

  • i agree with almost all of his edits, just dont want content to get lost, we all know how important content is, hidden content is not good content.... content.. .-~ Slimz ~-. 06:37, 27 January 2012 (PST)
  • Fan vids aren't content, they're growths on the article's backside. --Old meme 06:39, 27 January 2012 (PST)
  • Thanks, I'll get these articles looking good. Cleftpalete 12:37, 27 January 2012 (PST)
  • You do that. Call me if anyone else tries to revert your work. --Old meme 12:54, 27 January 2012 (PST)
  • You're a good man. That's all. I which I had your cajones. If you're female, you're still a good man, and I still wish I had your cojones. Love, Giantgroundsloth 19:03, 28 January 2012 (PST)
    • Thanks, more to come soon. I want to heal the world. Cleftpalete 19:08, 28 January 2012 (PST)
  • Ok i have been following your edits and still agree with most of them. I did revert and basically rewrite one of them because i felt that the section while poorly and written, still contained some information worth saving.

I salute you sir

You've done what no-one else on this wiki had the balls to do. Not even me. You took the fight to the spergs, and you won. You didn't even get banned like Delabonte did for it! Truly, you have accomplished great things in your short time here. The CWCki is a better place for having had you, and you've inspired me to start being harsh to faggots as well. I once thought their ilk could not be stopped, but you've given an old meme hope again youngster. Enjoy your break my friend, you have earned it. I'll hold the fort in your place. --Old meme 08:32, 17 February 2012 (PST)

  • While I can't endorse your underlying motives, Cleftpalete, I have similar sentiments as Old meme. I'd definitely say you're one of the better new editors. I haven't had any issues involving you, maybe I haven't paid enough attention, but do try to be civil with people, even as stupid as they can be. But if someone like Slimz gives you shit for your edits, just let me know, I'll have your back, bro.--Champthom 04:56, 18 February 2012 (PST)
  • Thank you very much, sirs. Cleftpalete 11:33, 21 February 2012 (PST)

Watch this article, comrade

The spergs have their eyes on it. --Old meme 08:31, 28 February 2012 (PST)

  • Alright, will do, my friend. Cleftpalete 11:21, 28 February 2012 (PST)


Sarah May article

I modified your edits to the article just now. It may be true that they made Chris do some stupid stuff for stupid reasons, but there's a reason why the GAMePLACe article doesn't mention that it was owned by a sex offender or how what BlueSpike did was wrong. It's not relevant to Chris. A half-intelligent reader can figure it out anyway.

While I understand and agree with your perspective on the material, what 'she' did or how she did it is far less relevant than how Chris responded, which should be the sole focus of the article. I'm not pretending you added paragraphs about how horrible Sarah May is, but I feel like parts were straying away from Chris.

On a similar note, leaving things open for the reader to interpret is important. That's why articles don't outright insult Chris, even when he's clearly wrong. It may just be me, but I feel that calling 'her' "twisted" or using words like "interrogating" is biased, even if it is correct. So that's why I did that.

That said, your stance on "holy shit he said Julie 4 TIMES" and then understating the suicide thing is something I can agree with, definitely. I use this example too much, but it's like when people were bitching at Chris for making fun of the Titanic because "PEOPLE DIED THERE". I think people try too hard to make Chris look like the bad guy sometimes.

I accept that you have a strong opinion on this, so if you think I'm wrong, just let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freecell (talk • contribs) 14:23, 2 March 2012 (PST)

  • First of all, you're telling me it's more important for Chris's reaction to be recorded than the action? The action completely influences the reaction! It is extremely relevant to Chris what happened, being that he was being blackmailed, which the article didn't even mention. That sounds pretty relevant to me.

Also, saying that the articles don't right insult Chris is simply not true, almost all articles outright insult Chris. I know that smart people like you don't want that here, but it's still there.

You need to be able to talk about specific people at least a little bit. To call Barb Snorlax, or even to go in depth about what Anna McLerran thinks about Chris now takes away from Chris, but is still relevant.

The article is awful, and it needs to be changed.Cleftpalete 14:58, 2 March 2012 (PST)

Retrieved from "http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cleftpalete&oldid=157865"