Talk:Chris and depression

From CWCki
Revision as of 13:35, 28 March 2014 by Nate-Kar Sonichu (talk | contribs) (Coment)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I hate to bum the new user who started this article but I say we delete this. It feels too A-loggy, plus we already have a Chris and Psychology article, and second I'm pretty much against users speculating about Chris's mental state. - NegaCWC (talk) 22:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

  • I was about to say, we do have that Chris and psychology article, it can easily go there. Though I don't think we have too much concrete about Chris actually being depressed. Maybe in a very colloquial sense but not in a clinical sense. --Champthom (talk) 07:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

I didn't just sit there and write an article bashing him; at the least I listed multiple reasons for why he would be that way, a quote of him being depressed, and the two bottom parts are just a filler. I didn't create it to bash, I just didn't really notice an article going over it, and the closest to it being would be stress. I wasn't really going to write a giant article on the spot. And speculation? It's pretty much spot on. --Toggletogs (talk) 06:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

I leave it as an article for deletion for now. If you want to make an article as a filler try making the article in your user space, such as User:Toggletogs/Chris and depression. Alan Pardew (talk) 10:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


As it stands, this article is mostly redundant with the stress article, but spinning the actually-depression-being-called-stress-because-Chris-has-a-terrible-vocabulary content onto this article sounds like a non-terrible idea to me. Nathan (talk) 18:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)