Difference between revisions of "File talk:001-Christophers1stSonic.jpg"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I forget where this discussion came up but apparently, Chris would have to have been at least 9 years old to draw this. Still pretty shitty for a nine year old - looks more like something ...) |
m (1 revision) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 17:30, 3 January 2010
I forget where this discussion came up but apparently, Chris would have to have been at least 9 years old to draw this. Still pretty shitty for a nine year old - looks more like something a two year old drew. --Champthom 22:54, 23 October 2009 (CEST)
