Difference between revisions of "File talk:JackSweetheart.jpg"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Perhaps it's an old mandate, but orders are not to post that link. Until that changes, I'm afraid I can't let you do that, Dave.) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I swear I have seen more pictures of this girl without clothes. Same bathroom and everything. Is this part of a a porn set? [[User:Dave|Dave]] 12:35, 3 December 2010 (PST) | I swear I have seen more pictures of this girl without clothes. Same bathroom and everything. Is this part of a a porn set? [[User:Dave|Dave]] 12:35, 3 December 2010 (PST) | ||
*Gee, if only there were some kind of WEBSITE that specialized in REVERSE IMAGE SEARCHES FUCK [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] 12:52, 3 December 2010 (PST) | *Gee, if only there were some kind of WEBSITE that specialized in REVERSE IMAGE SEARCHES FUCK [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] 12:52, 3 December 2010 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 4 December 2010
Anyone else here looking at her and thinking "jailbait"? --Caboose -1 18:40, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
- Yes,yes I do.Bealtespip122 18:47, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
- I was thinking "so far out Chris' league it's hilarious," but, now that you mention it... - Schismtracer 22:06, 14 September 2010 (PDT)
- THIS IS JACKIE!? I know she said she had low standards, but come on! She could do SO MUCH better. - ninjaclown 05:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- ...You really don't get how this works, do you? Freecell 13:21, 15 September 2010 (PDT)
Nude Set
I swear I have seen more pictures of this girl without clothes. Same bathroom and everything. Is this part of a a porn set? Dave 12:35, 3 December 2010 (PST)
- Gee, if only there were some kind of WEBSITE that specialized in REVERSE IMAGE SEARCHES FUCK Freecell 12:52, 3 December 2010 (PST)
