Difference between revisions of "Talk:15 October 2009"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:


I was going to remove the section with the video, then it seemed like somebody else did it already, so I left it be. Now someone put the section with the video back up. So, should we leave the video off this page or removing the link I made? It seems a bit redundant to have both, in my opinion. --[[User:That Man|That Man]] 00:10, 17 October 2009 (CEST)
I was going to remove the section with the video, then it seemed like somebody else did it already, so I left it be. Now someone put the section with the video back up. So, should we leave the video off this page or removing the link I made? It seems a bit redundant to have both, in my opinion. --[[User:That Man|That Man]] 00:10, 17 October 2009 (CEST)
== Any bets on Solid Chris' claim? ==
God knows he'll respond to the first thing Liquid posts. How long will he last before a Captain's log decries Liquid again? --[[User:OFSheep|OFSheep]] 02:40, 17 October 2009 (CEST)

Revision as of 20:40, 16 October 2009

Adding the return video from Liquid would be alright to do so here. Or just adding a bit of background about the return video. --Champthom 23:04, 16 October 2009 (CEST)

I'll get right on it. and oh god The Cleveland Show is fucking retarded why can't he develop taste Jump 23:17, 16 October 2009 (CEST)

I just made a link to the section of Liquid's page with the video on it. I figured this would make more sense than posting the video on this page --That Man 23:19, 16 October 2009 (CEST)

ffffff i read that after i put his video under there. fuck it, someone else can remove it if they want. i dont know --Jump 23:29, 16 October 2009 (CEST)

I was going to remove the section with the video, then it seemed like somebody else did it already, so I left it be. Now someone put the section with the video back up. So, should we leave the video off this page or removing the link I made? It seems a bit redundant to have both, in my opinion. --That Man 00:10, 17 October 2009 (CEST)

Any bets on Solid Chris' claim?

God knows he'll respond to the first thing Liquid posts. How long will he last before a Captain's log decries Liquid again? --OFSheep 02:40, 17 October 2009 (CEST)