Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris's Wikipedia profile"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
There's been some talk of trolls wanting to proliferate the spread of Chris amongst "morning zoo" style talk shows on the radio by e-mailing information about Chris. IMHO, I believe this is the best, annotated and brief introduction to Chris there is - Chris in his own words. The ED article is good but this is far more concise and it's Chris in his natural state. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 12:39, 13 May 2009 (CEST)
There's been some talk of trolls wanting to proliferate the spread of Chris amongst "morning zoo" style talk shows on the radio by e-mailing information about Chris. IMHO, I believe this is the best, annotated and brief introduction to Chris there is - Chris in his own words. The ED article is good but this is far more concise and it's Chris in his natural state. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 12:39, 13 May 2009 (CEST)
:Yeah, ED seems inappropriate for that purpose. [[User:Axe|Axe]] 13:55, 13 May 2009 (CEST)
:Yeah, ED seems inappropriate for that purpose. [[User:Axe|Axe]] 13:55, 13 May 2009 (CEST)
:Indeed! Toucher & Rich was just the beginning, Try to get him on Opie & Anthony, Don Imus or Howard Stern--[[User:Dan Dash|Dan Dash]] 23:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:44, 5 December 2011

There's been some talk of trolls wanting to proliferate the spread of Chris amongst "morning zoo" style talk shows on the radio by e-mailing information about Chris. IMHO, I believe this is the best, annotated and brief introduction to Chris there is - Chris in his own words. The ED article is good but this is far more concise and it's Chris in his natural state. --Champthom 12:39, 13 May 2009 (CEST)

Yeah, ED seems inappropriate for that purpose. Axe 13:55, 13 May 2009 (CEST)
Indeed! Toucher & Rich was just the beginning, Try to get him on Opie & Anthony, Don Imus or Howard Stern--Dan Dash 23:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)