Talk:DPF phonecall

lolwut?

So, someone went to the trouble of making a (shitty) stub (no offense) for this call. As I discuss here, there is some issues with this call. I'd rather not outright delete it but would anyone care to weigh in on how to treat this call? --Champthom 21:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

• Maybe we should make a single page for "fan chats" with Chris where all these types of calls go? It's not really notable enough to get its own page. --Delabonte 01:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

• I'm inclined to agree with Delabonte, HOWEVER I believe this would set a bad precedence. Ideally, CWCki promotes openness in trolling - this is why we require publicly available sources of information before things get cited.

Unlike Wikipedia, independent research should be encouraged such that if people can get Chris to clarify points about his work in such a way that it contributes to the CWCki or clarifies a previous misunderstanding, then we should accept that as evidence provided there's an accurate way to determine the legitimacy.

So where does this come in? Some faggots, while they are faggots, manage to get in touch with Chris and they make their conversation with him publicly available. They went outside conventional means of contacting Chris and these aren't the usual people who put out material (i.e. "Miscreants", "Secret Circle", what have you) guys but nonetheless, they had a conversation with Chris that provides a few tidbits of insight into Chris that were not publicly available. Yes, they're really annoying because they're trying really hard to earn Chris's trust and possibly attention whores but nonetheless, they could have easily kept this to themselves as many people are apt to do, that is to troll Chris and never share the results (early trolls had this problem, which is why we have no confirmed records of Jessica Ruddi and why some trolls hate "Ginger" - not because she's a troll who's working outside the system, but a troll who isn't making her results publicly available). We do have a page for that one interview people did with Chris, and they were sorta faggots, might as well let these faggots have a page here since their attention whoring is still outweighed by the insight provided. --Champthom 00:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

sorry about the stub

i'm still learning about the templates and cwcki editing, but after a quick reading of how to do it i improved it and left a note that it needs transcribing --Basgon 20:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Transcribing dis bitch

Imma break open a fresh pack of cigarettes and hop to transcribing part 2, for great justice --Banzai881 05:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Done the first part, will do more when I get back from driver's ed --Banzai881 05:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)