Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fuzzy-Wuzzies & Prickly-Wicklies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'This is a bad title for the page, given we have no evidence that Chris read this book. Fuzzy wuzzies and prickly wricklies can be on one page but this is a poor title for the pag…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a bad title for the page, given we have no evidence that Chris read this book. Fuzzy wuzzies and prickly wricklies can be on one page but this is a poor title for the page. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 00:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | This is a bad title for the page, given we have no evidence that Chris read this book. Fuzzy wuzzies and prickly wricklies can be on one page but this is a poor title for the page. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 00:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Furthermore, this article makes it seem like this is about the book, when it should be about Fuzzy wuzzies and prickly wicklies. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 01:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:37, 10 January 2010
This is a bad title for the page, given we have no evidence that Chris read this book. Fuzzy wuzzies and prickly wricklies can be on one page but this is a poor title for the page. --Champthom 00:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Furthermore, this article makes it seem like this is about the book, when it should be about Fuzzy wuzzies and prickly wicklies. --Champthom 01:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)