Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 52"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 5: Line 5:
I guess given the Simonchu issue this won't be answered soon. [[User:ExplodingSims|ExplodingSims]] 06:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I guess given the Simonchu issue this won't be answered soon. [[User:ExplodingSims|ExplodingSims]] 06:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
:The CWCipedia has recently been unfrozen, so Chris may just answer these letters later. --[[User:BreadGod|BreadGod]] 14:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
:The CWCipedia has recently been unfrozen, so Chris may just answer these letters later. --[[User:BreadGod|BreadGod]] 14:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
:*If those phone calls are anything to go by, then Chris was planning to do this mailbag only a little while before the CWCipedia was frozen out. I predict that he'll cover this very soon. I just wonder though how he will ansew these. A lot of them are addressing issues long since past. Specifically, I wonder how he will react to Evan's emails demanding Simonla be removed or Mike Jackson's widow? --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 16:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:04, 14 February 2010

Goddamn, this one hits hard. I predict a repeat of the All-Asperchu mailbag. Isarko 03:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

WELP

I guess given the Simonchu issue this won't be answered soon. ExplodingSims 06:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

The CWCipedia has recently been unfrozen, so Chris may just answer these letters later. --BreadGod 14:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
  • If those phone calls are anything to go by, then Chris was planning to do this mailbag only a little while before the CWCipedia was frozen out. I predict that he'll cover this very soon. I just wonder though how he will ansew these. A lot of them are addressing issues long since past. Specifically, I wonder how he will react to Evan's emails demanding Simonla be removed or Mike Jackson's widow? --Edward 16:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)