Difference between revisions of "Talk:PSEye"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
I severely doubt it's an EyeToy. The crap quality of his videos comes from bad lighting (the fart song and dedication to Ryan Cash videos were taken near a window during the day and are visually a huge improvement), the resolution of his videos fits the PSEye's minimum perfectly (320x240, the EyeToy only filmed in 640x480). [[User:PrinceAli|PrinceAli]]
I severely doubt it's an EyeToy. The crap quality of his videos comes from bad lighting (the fart song and dedication to Ryan Cash videos were taken near a window during the day and are visually a huge improvement), the resolution of his videos fits the PSEye's minimum perfectly (320x240, the EyeToy only filmed in 640x480). [[User:PrinceAli|PrinceAli]]
*I thought it looked like an Eyetoy in [[Singstar Challenge]], I'll check though. --[[User:Sonicow|Sonicow]] 08:30, 2 November 2009 (CET)


==Re: CWC Update 03042009==
==Re: CWC Update 03042009==

Revision as of 03:30, 2 November 2009

I severely doubt it's an EyeToy. The crap quality of his videos comes from bad lighting (the fart song and dedication to Ryan Cash videos were taken near a window during the day and are visually a huge improvement), the resolution of his videos fits the PSEye's minimum perfectly (320x240, the EyeToy only filmed in 640x480). PrinceAli

Re: CWC Update 03042009

Uh, wow. I can't believe I have to point this out, but

[spoiler]that's a date stamp (aka. Star Date): 03(March)04(the fourth day of)2009(the year)[/spoiler]

It's got nothing to do with Chris referencing the naming scheme of his video editing software. If it's on Chris' YouTube channel, it will coincide with the upload date shown on the viewing page. And yes, I know spoiler tags don't work, but I can't remember the code for blinking text -or if it's even enabled on here. --Whoreos n' Milf 01:34, 29 June 2009 (CEST)