Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pedofork"
m (4 revisions) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"...portmanteau for 'pedophile' and 'dork'" Just curious, has that been proven? It could just be that he was thinking of a less-offensive word that started with "f", and "fork" was the first thing that came to mind. [[User:Ayvuir|Ayvuir]] 19:03, 27 September 2009 (CEST) | "...portmanteau for 'pedophile' and 'dork'" Just curious, has that been proven? It could just be that he was thinking of a less-offensive word that started with "f", and "fork" was the first thing that came to mind. [[User:Ayvuir|Ayvuir]] 19:03, 27 September 2009 (CEST) | ||
*I think it's just assumed the word he wanted was 'dork' as he's called trolls dorks in several of his videos. I'm not sure why it's spelt 'pedofork' instead of 'pedophork' though. [[User:SirCucumber|SirCucumber]] 19:11, 27 September 2009 (CEST) | *I think it's just assumed the word he wanted was 'dork' as he's called trolls dorks in several of his videos. I'm not sure why it's spelt 'pedofork' instead of 'pedophork' though. [[User:SirCucumber|SirCucumber]] 19:11, 27 September 2009 (CEST) | ||
** Spelling is not one of Chris's strong suits. Not that he has any. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 02:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
I was going to suggest something along the lines of a "Evidence Chris is a pedofork" similar to the homo page, though there seems to be more evidence to the contrary. Even Lucas made a post in that Q&A thread along the lines of "Chris really never showed any signs like that, but if you wanna argue it, you can try" (which, BTW, was one of the few nice things he said about Chris). --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 15:37, 26 November 2009 (CET) | I was going to suggest something along the lines of a "Evidence Chris is a pedofork" similar to the homo page, though there seems to be more evidence to the contrary. Even Lucas made a post in that Q&A thread along the lines of "Chris really never showed any signs like that, but if you wanna argue it, you can try" (which, BTW, was one of the few nice things he said about Chris). --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 15:37, 26 November 2009 (CET) | ||
Lolisa: I dunno about that. I mean, she's ironically the MILF of all Rosechus. I wonder, what influence Chris used to name this character? Or maybe he completely misundrstood what "lolita" means? --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 10:50, 29 November 2009 (CET) | Lolisa: I dunno about that. I mean, she's ironically the MILF of all Rosechus. I wonder, what influence Chris used to name this character? Or maybe he completely misundrstood what "lolita" means? --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 10:50, 29 November 2009 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 17 March 2010
"...portmanteau for 'pedophile' and 'dork'" Just curious, has that been proven? It could just be that he was thinking of a less-offensive word that started with "f", and "fork" was the first thing that came to mind. Ayvuir 19:03, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
- I think it's just assumed the word he wanted was 'dork' as he's called trolls dorks in several of his videos. I'm not sure why it's spelt 'pedofork' instead of 'pedophork' though. SirCucumber 19:11, 27 September 2009 (CEST)
- Spelling is not one of Chris's strong suits. Not that he has any. --DStecks 02:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I was going to suggest something along the lines of a "Evidence Chris is a pedofork" similar to the homo page, though there seems to be more evidence to the contrary. Even Lucas made a post in that Q&A thread along the lines of "Chris really never showed any signs like that, but if you wanna argue it, you can try" (which, BTW, was one of the few nice things he said about Chris). --Champthom 15:37, 26 November 2009 (CET)
Lolisa: I dunno about that. I mean, she's ironically the MILF of all Rosechus. I wonder, what influence Chris used to name this character? Or maybe he completely misundrstood what "lolita" means? --GokuGetEm 10:50, 29 November 2009 (CET)