Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rejected Mailbag"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:When I wrote that, he hadn't moved all the E-mails he had deleted into the Rejected mailbag. As of right now, he still hasn't added the Deleted e-mails from mailbag 2. So I was trying to say that there are some e-mails he just plain eliminates without putting in the rejected mailbag.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 14:36, 28 November 2009 (CET) | :When I wrote that, he hadn't moved all the E-mails he had deleted into the Rejected mailbag. As of right now, he still hasn't added the Deleted e-mails from mailbag 2. So I was trying to say that there are some e-mails he just plain eliminates without putting in the rejected mailbag.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 14:36, 28 November 2009 (CET) | ||
::Oh. There should be a section for those on here. --[[User:Anaconda|Anaconda]] 21:32, 28 November 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 16:32, 28 November 2009
"It should be understood that Chris does not actually place all the e-mails he deletes in the rejected mailbox. As of this writing, many of the messages Chris has deleted have not been recorded on this page." Are you talking about ones that were posted and just deleted off the main page, or ones that didn't get through in the first place? I understand that sometimes emails aren't always getting through for some reason, and it isn't Chris's doing. --Anaconda 07:39, 28 November 2009 (CET)
- When I wrote that, he hadn't moved all the E-mails he had deleted into the Rejected mailbag. As of right now, he still hasn't added the Deleted e-mails from mailbag 2. So I was trying to say that there are some e-mails he just plain eliminates without putting in the rejected mailbag.--Beat 14:36, 28 November 2009 (CET)
- Oh. There should be a section for those on here. --Anaconda 21:32, 28 November 2009 (CET)