Talk:True and Loyal Fanbase

From CWCki
Revision as of 14:32, 11 March 2010 by Edward (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

To do

  • Chris's references to his true and loyal fanbase in his videos

Merge with Chris_and_Fame

The personal army section of the Chris and Fame article is great. True & Loyal Fanbase would fit really well as a section in/around that part of Chris and Fame, and it'd streamline linking personal army references. --Dude 07:07, 14 December 2009 (CET)

  • Keep. Not in a million years should this article go. --Delabonte 01:18, 26 December 2009 (CET)
  • Keep. The personal army thing should be more incorporated into this article. This would be an article about Sonichu fandom if it actually existed and the fact that there's no actual fandom is sorta why there's this article. Chris and Fame should explain how fame gets to Chris's head, which isn't quite the same as Chris's views of his fans and the relationship between the two. --Champthom 02:34, 26 December 2009 (CET)

Maybe we should look at merging Personal Army with this article then. That's a good suggestion. --Dude 20:02, 28 December 2009 (CET)

  • Do we really need this? There's merit in discussing the personal army aspect of Chris's alleged fandom, but I think it's mostly repeating what's already in the intro. --Champthom 08:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
  • It will need some editing but keeping the Personal Army angle is important since he called them to the rescue so many times. The text begs for Ironing but we need this. Griffintown 15:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

More on Gina?

The possibility of a real Sonichu fan is something that shouldn't go untouched. Yet the only time I have ever heard of her was in this sentence, and that one CWC video. Can we gather some more info?Double Nega 15:47, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Blog

Everyone is so shocked that Chris discovered CWCki that no one seems to have cared about the other contents of his latest blog. Anyone else notice that in that blog Chris Directly insulted his fans for wanting updates. This needs to be at least mentioned. --Edward 18:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC)