Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Infobox/video"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*Mmmmmkay. Seems reasonable enough. --[[User:Morganna|Morganna]] 19:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | *Mmmmmkay. Seems reasonable enough. --[[User:Morganna|Morganna]] 19:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
*OK, BRB, going through all of the videos I did replacing the dates. [[Fail|Lol.]] [[User:Xentrilus|Xentrilus]] 20:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
==i fuckin this template== | ==i fuckin this template== | ||
It's p. awesome, good job. --[[User:Sonichuis44|Sonichuis44]] 19:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | It's p. awesome, good job. --[[User:Sonichuis44|Sonichuis44]] 19:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
*lol. Thanks... I guess.--[[User:NeoShadow|NeoShadow]] 19:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | *lol. Thanks... I guess.--[[User:NeoShadow|NeoShadow]] 19:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:08, 4 January 2010
So is this eventually going to be on all the videos or what? Xentrilus 17:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm actually working on adding it to all the videos, right now. Here's an example of how it works.--NeoShadow 17:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Dating
This is a bit of a problem. The majority of the completed infoboxes use the dating format: MONTH DAY, YEAR. AFAIK this goes against the CWCki standard. Now IMO this wouldn't be that big of an issue, provided EVERY infobox used this format, but the thing is some of the infoboxes use the format DAY MONTH YEAR.
Before we go ANY further, we need to decide which one we should be using. Otherwise it could lead to quite a bit of extremely tedious work.
tl;dr, HALP WHAT DO WE DO. Xentrilus 19:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh snap, I didn't think of that... I guess, we should go by the CWCki standart DAY MONTH YEAR, just to play it safe.--NeoShadow 19:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Mmmmmkay. Seems reasonable enough. --Morganna 19:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK, BRB, going through all of the videos I did replacing the dates. Lol. Xentrilus 20:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
i fuckin this template
It's p. awesome, good job. --Sonichuis44 19:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- lol. Thanks... I guess.--NeoShadow 19:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)