Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Not Jerks"
(Created page with '==Nice== Seriously, this is good stuff. Personally, we really should have more specific templates than stuff like the "Web of Life" templates which can be a bit too broad. Just w…') |
(→Nice) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Minor complaint - is it really acceptable to lump his family with "acquaintances"? True, they might as well be to Chris, but is it too far of a stretch? Of course Chris has no reason to hate a family member who happens to be a male, but just wondering if maybe he only means acquaintances. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | Minor complaint - is it really acceptable to lump his family with "acquaintances"? True, they might as well be to Chris, but is it too far of a stretch? Of course Chris has no reason to hate a family member who happens to be a male, but just wondering if maybe he only means acquaintances. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Ah, based on the ED annotations. Then incorporate it into the template as such. In fact, I'll do that now. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:42, 9 February 2010
Nice
Seriously, this is good stuff. Personally, we really should have more specific templates than stuff like the "Web of Life" templates which can be a bit too broad. Just wondering, what is the basis of the ordering? I don't recall if this was an order Chris came up with or if this is something the template maker created. If this list is based off something Chris did, then incorporate where it's from somehow into the template.
Minor complaint - is it really acceptable to lump his family with "acquaintances"? True, they might as well be to Chris, but is it too far of a stretch? Of course Chris has no reason to hate a family member who happens to be a male, but just wondering if maybe he only means acquaintances. --Champthom 05:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, based on the ED annotations. Then incorporate it into the template as such. In fact, I'll do that now. --Champthom 05:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)