Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Sweethearts"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Kacey]] isn't a proper sweetheart, but that's my thought. Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 20:36, 8 November 2009 (CET)
[[Kacey]] isn't a proper sweetheart, but that's my thought. Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 20:36, 8 November 2009 (CET)
:I'd say she is.  I mean, Chris thought she was his girlfriend and referred to her as such. --[[User:Beat|Beat]] 20:51, 8 November 2009 (CET)
:I'd say she is.  I mean, Chris thought she was his girlfriend and referred to her as such. --[[User:Beat|Beat]] 20:51, 8 November 2009 (CET)
==Explanation==
# Put all sweethearts in a single "Past" section, to create an impressive chronological list;
# Added several "sweethearts-for-a-day", as they were as much romantic interests for Chris, as the long-term ones;
# Mixed real girls and things like "Officer Nasty" together, because imo it's hilarious and shows well Chris' level of patheticness;
# Added gal-pals, because with Chris, a girl may well be present on both lists (e.g., Megan, Sarah).
If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me --[[User:GokuGetEm|GokuGetEm]] 17:54, 30 November 2009 (CET)

Revision as of 12:54, 30 November 2009

Kacey isn't a proper sweetheart, but that's my thought. Thoughts? --Champthom 20:36, 8 November 2009 (CET)

I'd say she is. I mean, Chris thought she was his girlfriend and referred to her as such. --Beat 20:51, 8 November 2009 (CET)

Explanation

  1. Put all sweethearts in a single "Past" section, to create an impressive chronological list;
  2. Added several "sweethearts-for-a-day", as they were as much romantic interests for Chris, as the long-term ones;
  3. Mixed real girls and things like "Officer Nasty" together, because imo it's hilarious and shows well Chris' level of patheticness;
  4. Added gal-pals, because with Chris, a girl may well be present on both lists (e.g., Megan, Sarah).

If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me --GokuGetEm 17:54, 30 November 2009 (CET)