User talk:Dude

From CWCki
Jump to: navigation, search

Vidinfo

Nice job with the Vidinfo template. It'll take some getting use to, but I think it's really helpful in not making the External links page so clunky and having to see which episode you want to see the videobook or audiobook version for. As a suggestion, perhaps you might want to tweak this template though so you also have a "Read it" option for those who wish to read the original source material at CWCipedia. Otherwise, this is a very good idea and I thank you personally for it. --Champthom 08:00, 11 December 2009 (CET)

User talk:Umad

  • Hey, man. Heard bout your account mishap. That sucks :(

Oh, but check it out. The video infobox has caught on, and we now have tons of chinese laborers working on spreading them as much as possible. Hell, it now even has a spin-off.--NeoShadow 23:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Your new shirt icons kick ass. I have to go back and double-check all the old vids for shirts that I missed but... eh... that can wait 'till tomorrow. --Morganna 02:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
  • I have to agree. Great job with the new shirt icons. Better check back on all the shirts I put as "Undocumented" in the early videos.--NeoShadow 06:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Thanks! I made one that I knew fit a lot of videos, but now I think I've made a couple one-offs... I guess I'm going to have to give myself a "notoriety standard" or something, because if I don't, there's going to be a ton of 1-shot thrift-store rugby shirt icons =( --Umad 06:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you Umad for the cleaning job on the List of videos page. You just have fixed my next project and saved me lots of time. Griffintown 03:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Message me

Contact me on AIM or in #sonichu to talk about getting your old account back and a proposition. --Champthom 01:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Hey buddy!

Don't just pop a gallery in the middle of a CWChronology page, ok? It looks messy. Btw I like the shit you added, but we'll find one spot in the images on the side of the article for one of your images, there's no way they all need to be on there. (Try to think categorical imperative, your submission isn't any more important than the others). Take care! RachmaninovDESU 19:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

lol wut Dude 23:14, 12 July 2011 (PDT)