Difference between revisions of "User talk:NegaCWC"
UncleBastard (talk | contribs) m |
m (Been a day and an age since I've used the wrong form of 'your'. A little embarrassing.) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Cole== | ==Cole== | ||
I'd be interested to see if it is genuine, I've not seen any public acknowledgement from Cole about Chris otherwise.--[[User:UncleBastard|UncleBastard]] 19:29, 29 June 2012 (PDT) | I'd be interested to see if it is genuine, I've not seen any public acknowledgement from Cole about Chris otherwise.--[[User:UncleBastard|UncleBastard]] 19:29, 29 June 2012 (PDT) | ||
==Memes?== | |||
Hey man, thanks for reviewing my changes. You changed the description of that hand drawn Chris picture back to "ORIGINAL IDENTITY. DO NOT STEAL.". I too thought this description was pretty funny but the reason I changed it was because in my mind, people who come to the site and aren't savvy with memes won't understand that reference. I understand that the Cwcki is currently a strange bastardization between ED shitfest and semi-factual fan page so this kind of stuff is unavoidable. I try to lean toward "semi-factual fanpage" and let Chris's antics provide the comedy rather than have editors try hard to make jokes about him in articles. Let me know what you think! | |||
Cheers! --[[User:Skullhat|Skullhat]] ([[User talk:Skullhat|talk]]) 22:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)skullhat | |||
* Eh, I think both are acceptable. However, Champ wants this CWCki to have an anti-meme policy so I think I should change it back. Anyway, good job on the re-edit, Skullhat. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 08:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Re: 25 July 2014 leak == | |||
Go ahead. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 12:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Re: Need moar Jerkops == | |||
I'm actually considering of promoting some users to Jerkops. I'll let you know soon. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 02:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Chris: Homo == | |||
I noticed you put Chris under the 'Homos' category. You think that's funny? How could he possibly be a homogay if he's explicitly stated he is straight? It's not as if he's [[Tomgirl|insecure about his sexuality]], or anything. Now reverse that edit, this instant. [[User:Boomhauer|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer|talk]]) 0:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Re: CWC merchandice sent to a forum member == | |||
Add it then. Really sorry for the late reply. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 06:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Jerkop status == | |||
I'm promoting you to mod status considering there seems to be lacking of mods in a very long time. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 14:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Re:Thanks for the promotion! == | |||
If there's a vandal or spammer, just block him forever (indefinite) as ever since this wiki is made the bans are indefinite for people who vandalise or spamming here. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] ([[User talk:Alan Pardew|talk]]) 13:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Good to see you're back == | |||
Been awhile since I've seen you making any edits. Hopefully you're around more; most of your articles are pretty professional. [[User:Boomhauer|Boomhauer]] ([[User talk:Boomhauer|talk]]) 22:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:23, 17 January 2015
Your post on the Chris talk page
You made some good points, I haven't gotten around to it yet (mind you, I'm an awful procrastinator) but I'll get it to addressing your concerns eventually.--Champthom 09:09, 6 August 2011 (PDT)
Ivy's age
It's been on the page for two years and you're probably the first person to notice that, or at least the first person to say anything about it. I tip my hat to you on that.--Champthom 04:51, 3 September 2011 (PDT)
Cole
I'd be interested to see if it is genuine, I've not seen any public acknowledgement from Cole about Chris otherwise.--UncleBastard 19:29, 29 June 2012 (PDT)
Memes?
Hey man, thanks for reviewing my changes. You changed the description of that hand drawn Chris picture back to "ORIGINAL IDENTITY. DO NOT STEAL.". I too thought this description was pretty funny but the reason I changed it was because in my mind, people who come to the site and aren't savvy with memes won't understand that reference. I understand that the Cwcki is currently a strange bastardization between ED shitfest and semi-factual fan page so this kind of stuff is unavoidable. I try to lean toward "semi-factual fanpage" and let Chris's antics provide the comedy rather than have editors try hard to make jokes about him in articles. Let me know what you think! Cheers! --Skullhat (talk) 22:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)skullhat
- Eh, I think both are acceptable. However, Champ wants this CWCki to have an anti-meme policy so I think I should change it back. Anyway, good job on the re-edit, Skullhat. Alan Pardew (talk) 08:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Re: 25 July 2014 leak
Go ahead. Alan Pardew (talk) 12:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Re: Need moar Jerkops
I'm actually considering of promoting some users to Jerkops. I'll let you know soon. Alan Pardew (talk) 02:53, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Chris: Homo
I noticed you put Chris under the 'Homos' category. You think that's funny? How could he possibly be a homogay if he's explicitly stated he is straight? It's not as if he's insecure about his sexuality, or anything. Now reverse that edit, this instant. Boomhauer (talk) 0:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Re: CWC merchandice sent to a forum member
Add it then. Really sorry for the late reply. Alan Pardew (talk) 06:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Jerkop status
I'm promoting you to mod status considering there seems to be lacking of mods in a very long time. Alan Pardew (talk) 14:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Re:Thanks for the promotion!
If there's a vandal or spammer, just block him forever (indefinite) as ever since this wiki is made the bans are indefinite for people who vandalise or spamming here. Alan Pardew (talk) 13:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Good to see you're back
Been awhile since I've seen you making any edits. Hopefully you're around more; most of your articles are pretty professional. Boomhauer (talk) 22:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)