Difference between revisions of "User:Elbow-Greased Strongman/Philosophy"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Essay}} Chris has views on philosophy that are inconsistent and incoherent. ==Impossibility of perfection== nothing is able to be completely perfect, which means having any standards at all is wrong.")
 
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Essay}}
{{Essay}}


Chris has views on philosophy that are inconsistent and incoherent.
Chris holds philosophical views that are inconsistent and incoherent.




==Impossibility of perfection==
==Impossibility of perfection==


nothing is able to be completely perfect, which means having any standards at all is wrong.
One of Chris's most consistent and long-held beliefs is that because nothing is able to be completely perfect, having any standards at all is wrong.
 
Rather than let 'perfect' be the enemy of 'good', he lets 'imperfect' be the enemy of 'decent' when 'decent' is something he falls short of.
 
* His [[Financhu Crisis|fiscal irresponsibility]] is no big deal because people sometimes spend small amounts of money on frivolous things.<ref>[[Apologies for offending people]]</ref>
* Him [[DIRTY, CRAPPED BRIEFS|regularly shitting his pants]] doesn't matter since "who hasn't in their lifetime pooed their childhood diapers[?]".<ref>[[Captain's Log, Stardate April 28th, 2009]]</ref>
 
(I'm surprised he never tried to justify his incestuous affair with the fact that all humans share a common ancestor, thus making everyone very, very distantly related)
 
 
==Solipsism==
 
This is readily apparent (humble, sane people tend to not believe that they are deities)
 
Chris holds beliefs resembling those of a child who never learned that other people have inner lives of their own

Latest revision as of 17:46, 10 April 2026


Chris holds philosophical views that are inconsistent and incoherent.


Impossibility of perfection

One of Chris's most consistent and long-held beliefs is that because nothing is able to be completely perfect, having any standards at all is wrong.

Rather than let 'perfect' be the enemy of 'good', he lets 'imperfect' be the enemy of 'decent' when 'decent' is something he falls short of.

(I'm surprised he never tried to justify his incestuous affair with the fact that all humans share a common ancestor, thus making everyone very, very distantly related)


Solipsism

This is readily apparent (humble, sane people tend to not believe that they are deities)

Chris holds beliefs resembling those of a child who never learned that other people have inner lives of their own