User talk:Briscoe/Chris and Reliability

Thought this would be a good "Chris and..." page. It needs to be expanded and added to Template:Chris and -Cody 11:32 PM January 4th 2010

• I second this! The world needs to know exactly how unreliable he is. --CWCAttack 05:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
• This is really starting to push it. Srsly, can you think of a better name than "Chris and x"? It's starting to be done to death. Also, can you elaborate what you're aiming for this page? --Champthom 05:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • It always makes me so warm when Champ gets irritated.... --Tristran 06:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree with Champ; for one thing if all you can think of off the top of your head is one sentence, then maybe you should reconsider. For another, what can go in this page that can't go into some other, broader page? It's ridiculously specific. I like the idea of the "Chris and..." pages, since they give a good overview of Chris, but that's what they should be, an overview from which you can dig deeper, not treatises on specific personality traits (for which there probably isn't even enough for an article). --Sonichuis44 06:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • The page sounds like another shade of grey. Reliability is way to narrow for the "Chris and..." series. Griffintown 06:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

• Griffintown and Sonichuis44 expressed my concerns that I was unable to express myself. I mean, the "Chris and" series, as Sonichuis44 put it well, the "Chris and" series really should serve to cover broad topics about Chris - sex, his narcissism, fashion, etc. These articles then address broad topics and then cover specifics. Chris and religion is about how Chris views religion, and then it talks about how he uses it to serve his own purposes, GodJesus, his views of other religion, etc.

This stuff can easily go into other pages, unless you can somehow elaborate upon this. And as for the name - not everything has to be "Chris and x." In a way, pretty much half the articles here could be a "Chris and" article. JERKS could easily be called "Chris and men." Christmas could easily be called "Chris and Christmas." Be original. I have no idea who started "Chris and x" but I don't recall if it was me. And by the way, you can prove me wrong - I recall I was tempted to move Death threats into Chris and anger but people were able to flush out enough details that it really showed that it warranted its own pages. It's going to be difficult here though, as "reliability" is pretty subjective and for me, Chris posting comics more than every six months is reliable.

I'll leave this page here for a while but if it doesn't improve in a week, I'll delete it. --Champthom 06:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

What I meant

I mean all of the times Chris has promised something, but not delivered. Also all the times he cheated on his e-girlfriends. -Cody

• So... You're going to make a list of missed deadlines? Sweet, bro, sign me up. And the latter has nothing to do with "reliability," unless you mean how we can rely on Chris fucking up, but that is pretty much the whole reason this wiki exists. And I just noticed, you're that retarded 13 year old kid who thinks he's hot shit because Chris once commented on your video and you're TOTALLY gonna take pictures of Chris's house next time you visit Meemaw and Pop-pop. God, you fail as hard as Chris. --Sonichuis44 08:02, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Not 13, I apoligised for what I did, and that trip has been canceled becuase my mom got MS Cody

Cody is a homo

This page does not need to exist in any shape or form. It is probably the worst, most pointless article in the entire CWCki. Champthom, tear down this page. --Delabonte 02:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Deletion Notice

This page will be deleted on the wee hours of January 10 2009 if no-one makes a valid case on why this entry should exist here or anywhere else. Griffintown 07:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Waving the white flag

I thought there would be more to talk about on this page, Im fine if it gets deleted -Briscoe 2:08 PM, January 7th 2010

• Maybe I am a tad rough on this. Truth being told, Champthon gave this page up to 12 January and I am ill-placed to go back on this. This is my mistake. What I would like to see is more improvement. What about sending it on a private sandbox? With a little more work and a new name, this page could make a great addition. Right now, I would see it as a stand-alone if more detailed or as a subtext for the Chris and hypocrisy. What do you think? Griffintown 22:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
• So add it to Chris and hypocrisy? Im pretty sure I could improve it before the 12th, but I cant tommorow (im getting braces)