Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 60"
m |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
What do we do about that..? --[[User:AsperGirl|AsperGirl]] 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | What do we do about that..? --[[User:AsperGirl|AsperGirl]] 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Nothing. He's never gonna answer deleted emails. We may as well forget it. Unless the Sysop decideds to bring them back, then theres no point in catalouging them. Just makea brief mention that there were originally more letters but that they were deleted. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 12:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | *Nothing. He's never gonna answer deleted emails. We may as well forget it. Unless the Sysop decideds to bring them back, then theres no point in catalouging them. Just makea brief mention that there were originally more letters but that they were deleted. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 12:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
what are you talking about? they are still there [[User:Clydec|Clydec]] 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
*I think shes reffering to the old ones. When the Sysop condensed a few of the mailbags into one a chunk of the letters were deleted entirely. And not by Chris surprisingly. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 19:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
*When 110mb was down, the Mailbag pages still worked for some reason, but were empty. -- [[User:Revolver Octopus|Revolver Octopus]] 19:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:45, 4 April 2010
Jesus, the mailbag gets shorter as they go, don't they? Amenta101 17:40, March 8 2010, Greenwich Mean Time (AUS)
- I'm willing to bet that more letters are added over time. This has happened before. Alternately, this could be an experiment to see if Chris gives better answers to just a few letters.--Beat 11:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm willing to bet that it is to get Chris to respond at all. He's barely made a peep this last week. --OFSheep 12:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
I think a letter pointing this out ought to be submitted--also, what's up with the poll and why is Sonichu being allowed to win it--oh wait, it's a trick. "Who deserves" is different from "Who wins", and we'll pull the "face value" shit on Chris. Funny, but I think Asperchu winning would be funnier. We'll just get another "YOU HYPOCRITE" round that goes right over Chris's head, letting Asperchu steal an award(something Chris is very sensitive to) would hurt more. Then again, if we let Sonichu win one poll, invalidate it, and then have another one where Asperchu wins it will hurt just as much.--MoarLurk 23:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think Sonichu should win, but that's just me hating Chris. My suggestions are always to have him hurt as much as possible. I don't think his hypocrisy needs any emphasizing after Sonichu 10's ending, either way. --OFSheep 02:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Why is there nothing about Bob?--Doomknight 08:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Bob
Finally a mail about Bob. Hopefully he won't be a faggot and actually answer it.Wise dude321 05:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
That's the idea. --TubularMonkey 06:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Mailbags 59-61 Are Erased From Cwcipedia.
...
What do we do about that..? --AsperGirl 09:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing. He's never gonna answer deleted emails. We may as well forget it. Unless the Sysop decideds to bring them back, then theres no point in catalouging them. Just makea brief mention that there were originally more letters but that they were deleted. --Edward 12:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
what are you talking about? they are still there Clydec 17:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- I think shes reffering to the old ones. When the Sysop condensed a few of the mailbags into one a chunk of the letters were deleted entirely. And not by Chris surprisingly. --Edward 19:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- When 110mb was down, the Mailbag pages still worked for some reason, but were empty. -- Revolver Octopus 19:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)