Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Simpsons"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
****Okay then, I'll wait until it's finished before passing judgement. I'm curious as to how this article will end up now. [[User_talk:Rubidium|<sup><font size="2">37</font></sup>]] [[User:Rubidium|<font size="4">'''Rb'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Rubidium|<sup><font size="1">85.468</font></sup>]] 20:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
****Okay then, I'll wait until it's finished before passing judgement. I'm curious as to how this article will end up now. [[User_talk:Rubidium|<sup><font size="2">37</font></sup>]] [[User:Rubidium|<font size="4">'''Rb'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Rubidium|<sup><font size="1">85.468</font></sup>]] 20:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
*****I am as well.--[[User:Hieghts503|Hieghts503]] 3:40, 21 Febuary 2010 (EST)
*****I am as well.--[[User:Hieghts503|Hieghts503]] 3:40, 21 Febuary 2010 (EST)
Actually at times Maggie has displayed some high intelligence.--[[User:Hieghtts503|Hieghts503]] 5:11, 21 Febuary 2010 (EST)
* Well I wouldn't class her as "overly intelligent". The one where everyone thought she was clever (The one with Simon Cowell in) was actually Lisa giving her the answers. She did shoot Mr. Burns, which would take some level of intelligence for a baby, but not enough to rank in the same grade as Stewie and Lisa. [[User_talk:Rubidium|<sup><font size="2">37</font></sup>]] [[User:Rubidium|<font size="4">'''Rb'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Rubidium|<sup><font size="1">85.468</font></sup>]] 22:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
**True.--[[User:Hieghts503|Hieghts503]] 6:16, 21 Febuary 2010 (EST)
*I have de-failed the article (a little). Pray I do not de-fail it further. -[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 12:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Are we really going to focus on the fact that Marge is married? I remind you that both she and her husband are fictional. I somehow doubt that lusting it would count as adultery. It would probably count as several others things though. So why is the article talking about the fact that Marge is married, and not on the fact that Chris is once again getting off to an imaginary woman? --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 15:47, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
** Don't you remember that Chris thinks cartoon characters are real, and with that being said while it would be sad to be jelous of a fictional character, in Chris's mind they're as real as he is.[[User:Hieghts503|Hieghts503]] 16:47, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
:*An interesting point. I guess it's just that Chris claims to be hyper religious, but it's just another example of him not following his own rules when they're inconvenient. 'twas just an idea.-[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 15:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
::*Regardless, I suggest we give it the same treatment as the Meg Griffin article and point this out. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 16:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:47, 30 April 2010

This page needs more images. --Hieghts503 11:53 21 Febuary 2010 (EST)

  • To be honest, I don't think there is enough that links Chris with The Simpsons, especially not to warrent its own article. 37 Rb 85.468 17:12, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Well Champ suggested it.--Hieghts503 1:17, 21 Febuary 2010 (EST)
    • Wait, what? Where did I say this? In any case, I wonder what the hell I was smoking.
If I did suggest an article, I'm guessing it's because 1) this is one of Chris's favorite shows, 2) Chris compares himself to Homer sometimes, 3) Simpsons occasionally appear in Chris's works or videos (like the Marge image from Playboy), etc. It won't be a lengthy article and it doesn't really need an in depth analysis of why Chris is drawn to it, just mostly like "Chris likes it, here's a few places it's shown up in." --Champthom 21:09, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
    • Leave Champ to me.* I read what was proposed and that could be fit into a paragraph, then what? You're left rambling on about things that have already been said or things about the show that don't relate to Chris. 37 Rb 85.468 19:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC) *Just kidding. Please don't hurt me.
      • I do agree with you on some points such as Chris barly ever mentioning The Simpsons, but still I'm pretty sure that if you look at alot of the comics you'll no doubt see one or two phrases stolen from them.--Hieghts503 2:40, 21 Febuary 2010 (EST)
        • Okay then, I'll wait until it's finished before passing judgement. I'm curious as to how this article will end up now. 37 Rb 85.468 20:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
          • I am as well.--Hieghts503 3:40, 21 Febuary 2010 (EST)

Actually at times Maggie has displayed some high intelligence.--Hieghts503 5:11, 21 Febuary 2010 (EST)

  • Well I wouldn't class her as "overly intelligent". The one where everyone thought she was clever (The one with Simon Cowell in) was actually Lisa giving her the answers. She did shoot Mr. Burns, which would take some level of intelligence for a baby, but not enough to rank in the same grade as Stewie and Lisa. 37 Rb 85.468 22:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
  • I have de-failed the article (a little). Pray I do not de-fail it further. -Ronichu 12:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Are we really going to focus on the fact that Marge is married? I remind you that both she and her husband are fictional. I somehow doubt that lusting it would count as adultery. It would probably count as several others things though. So why is the article talking about the fact that Marge is married, and not on the fact that Chris is once again getting off to an imaginary woman? --Edward 15:47, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

    • Don't you remember that Chris thinks cartoon characters are real, and with that being said while it would be sad to be jelous of a fictional character, in Chris's mind they're as real as he is.Hieghts503 16:47, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
  • An interesting point. I guess it's just that Chris claims to be hyper religious, but it's just another example of him not following his own rules when they're inconvenient. 'twas just an idea.-Ronichu 15:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Regardless, I suggest we give it the same treatment as the Meg Griffin article and point this out. --Edward 16:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)