Difference between revisions of "Talk:April 2011"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I'm not sure if the prank calls by PCAssassins should go here. They revealed some information, sure, but historically these sorts of things haven't ended up in these articles. ~~~~") |
|||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not sure if the prank calls by PCAssassins should go here. They revealed some information, sure, but historically these sorts of things haven't ended up in these articles. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell|c)]] 07:01, 9 April 2011 (PDT) | I'm not sure if the prank calls by PCAssassins should go here. They revealed some information, sure, but historically these sorts of things haven't ended up in these articles. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell|c)]] 07:01, 9 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
Well we don't have much else to go with. These past few months have been quiet as fuck. [[User:Nullity|Nullity]] 08:05, 9 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
:True, but I'm not sure if there's a policy on this or not. Either this is "It gave valuable information, so it goes into the article" or it's "It was a prank call, so it goes into the article". Which one the admins want will have an effect on several articles. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell|c)]] 07:45, 9 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
Can't it go in both? I added the call to the Prank Calls page, anyway. Admins can make a ''Sophie's Choice'' now. [[User:Nullity|Nullity]] 07:59, 9 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
*I think adding prank call stuff to the CWChronology would be a bad precedent and comes off as being too desperate. If Chris does nothing this month, so be it, but we don't need to add filler.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 13:31, 9 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
:Should I then take out the prank call entry for March 2011?[[User:Nullity|Nullity]] 17:20, 11 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
:*It's there? If it is, yeah. In any case, good thinking about putting it in the prank call page. I totally forgot about that page and I was ready to make a page for the call, so people would stop bitching about there being a "conspiracy" but putting it on the prank calls page is definitely the best solution. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 15:59, 9 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
Should the ED page being removed once and for all be mentioned here? If Chris was still active it would certainly be an event of significance. [[User:Nullity|Nullity]] 20:19, 14 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
:Nah. Chris won't do shit. If he does, then you can put something about it. [[User:Canine|Canine]] 21:35, 14 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
::Chris won't care because CWCki's still up. [[User:Shiny|Shiny]] 02:40, 15 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
Chris created a Tomgirl vehicle for ModNation Racers. He even has a picture of himself driving the vehicle. [[User:Nullity|Nullity]] 00:47, 20 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
*True, this is new activity but I believe historically, this sort of thing as been relegated to the PSN Tracker. We might be getting desperate but there's no need to show it.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:07, 20 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
If you people insist stuff be on here, incorporate stuff from the PSN Tracker, like the ModNation racer stuff.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:09, 20 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:09, 20 April 2011
I'm not sure if the prank calls by PCAssassins should go here. They revealed some information, sure, but historically these sorts of things haven't ended up in these articles. Freecell (t/c) 07:01, 9 April 2011 (PDT)
Well we don't have much else to go with. These past few months have been quiet as fuck. Nullity 08:05, 9 April 2011 (PDT)
- True, but I'm not sure if there's a policy on this or not. Either this is "It gave valuable information, so it goes into the article" or it's "It was a prank call, so it goes into the article". Which one the admins want will have an effect on several articles. Freecell (t/c) 07:45, 9 April 2011 (PDT)
Can't it go in both? I added the call to the Prank Calls page, anyway. Admins can make a Sophie's Choice now. Nullity 07:59, 9 April 2011 (PDT)
- I think adding prank call stuff to the CWChronology would be a bad precedent and comes off as being too desperate. If Chris does nothing this month, so be it, but we don't need to add filler.--Champthom 13:31, 9 April 2011 (PDT)
- Should I then take out the prank call entry for March 2011?Nullity 17:20, 11 April 2011 (PDT)
- It's there? If it is, yeah. In any case, good thinking about putting it in the prank call page. I totally forgot about that page and I was ready to make a page for the call, so people would stop bitching about there being a "conspiracy" but putting it on the prank calls page is definitely the best solution. --Champthom 15:59, 9 April 2011 (PDT)
Should the ED page being removed once and for all be mentioned here? If Chris was still active it would certainly be an event of significance. Nullity 20:19, 14 April 2011 (PDT)
- Nah. Chris won't do shit. If he does, then you can put something about it. Canine 21:35, 14 April 2011 (PDT)
- Chris won't care because CWCki's still up. Shiny 02:40, 15 April 2011 (PDT)
Chris created a Tomgirl vehicle for ModNation Racers. He even has a picture of himself driving the vehicle. Nullity 00:47, 20 April 2011 (PDT)
- True, this is new activity but I believe historically, this sort of thing as been relegated to the PSN Tracker. We might be getting desperate but there's no need to show it.--Champthom 05:07, 20 April 2011 (PDT)
If you people insist stuff be on here, incorporate stuff from the PSN Tracker, like the ModNation racer stuff.--Champthom 05:09, 20 April 2011 (PDT)