Difference between revisions of "Talk:Simonla Rosechu"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Robot: Reporting unavailable external link)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 54: Line 54:


--[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 03:05, 28 September 2011 (PDT)
--[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 03:05, 28 September 2011 (PDT)
== Dead link 2 ==
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://simonchucomics.deviantart.com/
** In [[Simonla Rosechu]] on 2011-09-20 22:40:01, 403 Forbidden
** In [[Simonla Rosechu]] on 2011-09-28 10:06:02, 403 Forbidden
--[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 03:05, 28 September 2011 (PDT)
==Simonla the Linchpin Section==
Is this based on anything or is it supposed to be highly speculative? I'm not saying that it should go away or anything, I'm just wondering if there are any smoking guns or at least circumstantial evidence to support this view. --[[User:Singel Minory Comic|Singel Minory Comic]] ([[User talk:Singel Minory Comic|talk]]) 06:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
* I'm kind of torn on this section in some ways. I feel like it has potential but without some kind of quote or email to link this line of thinking to Chris it seems way too speculative. Even then, it could really use a trim in terms of sheer bulk. There's a lot of ideas that could be more clearly said with less repetition and cruft. Would this really be a section about Simonla, or more about Chris's psychology?--[[User:EDit209|EDit209]] ([[User talk:EDit209|talk]]) 00:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
* I'd say it fits, but adding it as a sidenote for Chris and psychology wouldn't be a bad idea, either. But I digress, it could use a little trimming on details, or overall bulkiness.

Latest revision as of 20:18, 11 August 2014

Who the hell wrote that bit about Simonla being based on some anime character? They totally need to LURK MOAR. Anyways, this article needs the e-mail that Chris talked about developing Simonla (there's an e-mail correspondence with Evan, IIRC). --Champthom 02:37, 15 March 2009 (CET)

  • Okay I admit it. That was me. I had read that somewhere. I'm so gosh durn lazy. I'm just like Chris.~User:gourmetpickle
    • Oh, yeah, there were e-mails. I posted them proudly for all to see because he just told me "I reworked your character and put it in the new issue, it'll be out soon." Imagine my surprise to return to that thread after school and find Chris-chan did a little more than reworking. I will take screencaps of those e-mails and post them when it's not 2am Evang7 07:47, 27 April 2009 (CEST)
      • Wait, shit, I actually have a lot more e-mails with him responding to me than I had initially remembered. Huh. I'll try and find a place for those too. Evang7 07:50, 27 April 2009 (CEST)
        • On further notice, it seems the first e-mail he replied to about Simonla is gone. Why the fuck would I delete that. I do have some further correspondence with me asking why the fuck he did that shit and instead just telling me that the Livejournal account made in his name was a fake, saying "Why would I call Anne Boleyn deaf?" and ignoring the more pressing matters of "WHY IS SIMONCHU A GIRL NOW". I also have e-mails where he explains why the Blake rape scene was removed. Evang7 07:54, 27 April 2009 (CEST)
          • I'm curious as to why the hell Simonla was decided as the feminine of Simon? Was Simone or Simona too HIGH LEVEL a concept of that guy? The whole idea of Christian actually (mis)appropriating the character into his comics is hilarious though. Condolences on your future grandson REGINALD, however. Mall Conductor Bear 09:05, 27 April 2009 (CEST)
            • Oh god, you just made me realize that in CWCville I would be considered Simonla's father. GO SIMONLA! GO FORTH AND DO THE IMPOSSIBLE, SEE THE INVISIBLE! 01:33, 28 April 2009 (CEST)
              • Simonla Rosechu yelling "I AM SIMONLA, LEADER OF THE SONICHURREN GANG! WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK I AM!?"... DOTH NOT WANTETH. DDDX -- Da Nuke 06:57, 13 May 2009 (CEST)

(More) To do

Clean up the articles as there's more pictures than there is to text (in other words, get a gallery going), and also incorporate shit from the new CWCipedia articles. Looks like Chris is acknowledging Evan's threats of suing Chris over Simonchu/Simonla. --Champthom 16:23, 9 September 2009 (CEST)

  • Thanks for cleaning this up, I've been meaning to do it myself but I'm a lazy fuck who wants to play Street Fighter all day. I need to tidy up my own page too because it's a fucking sloppy wall of text as it stands Evang7 04:35, 10 September 2009 (CEST)

Where's Simonchu?

Episode 20 is over. Simonchu is kinda... not there. Wonder what would happen if Chris was called out on it? --OFSheep 03:15, 23 December 2009 (CET)

  • If I had my guess, he'll probably brush it off and say that there was some sort of agreement not to put him in at the last minute or something. --Blazer 03:59, 23 December 2009 (CET)

Quick to Replace

I am not surprised. I am not surprised at the least --Blazer 19:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Exploding Toilet Stolen?

  • Was Simonla's death inspired by the Lethal Weapon movies or ripped out from one of them? I think the 1st one has the exploding toilet or the 2nd one. I saw a scene when I was younger though.--UJ1A1985 05:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure if Chis stole it from them, but it's in lethal weapon 3, yeah.--Beat 07:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
      • actually it was from lethal weapon 2. it being lifted directly from the film is supported by the position of the voltorb, directly behind the toilet. Presumably when one (especially a child) thinks of a toilet bomb they think of a cherry bomb inside the bowl, but in lethal weapon 2 its on the floor behind it.Crunchler 21:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
        • I think he got the idea from a simpsons episode in which homer references lethal weapon, i doubt chris saw any of the lethal weapon movies.Basgon 22:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
          • In the simpsons ep homer says "before lethal weapon 2 i never thought there could be a bomb IN my toilet, now i check every time." if he had only seen it on the simpsons he would have put it in the toilet, not behind it.Crunchler 05:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I doubt he's ever seen the film itself, just knows of the scene. Like how many people know of the music in 2001 or the monoliths in it without every seeing the film. Plus, I doubt Chris would understand or like the film, it being pro Niggo and all.JamieTyler 23:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

An Egg

Issue 10, page 79, An Egg, looks like there will be more simonchu shennanigans, with sandy, "Evan Killed mommy" Magi-chan is badass once more . also simonchu is a terrorist aparently--Basgon 07:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

  • See "quick to replace" above. Of course, it was a contrived little bit of info to try and exploit a loophole in Evan's WrathTM, but it really might just piss him off and get the site DMCAed again. -- Mikhail Faulken 07:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

I noticed similarities between Simonichu and some other character.

Doesn't look much like Simon from Tengen-thingy to me, rather a lot more like Megalon from Godzilla vs Megalon.

http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/pictures/tv.film/Godzilla/megalon.jpg compared to http://www.cogsdev.org/cwcki/File:Simonchu_by_Evang_y.png

Is this even noteworthy or am I just trying too hard? (though I see where the guy gets this Beedrill from.) Debate. No. 06:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh forget it. No. 14:38, 2 September 2010 (PDT)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--Anonymax 03:05, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--Anonymax 03:05, 28 September 2011 (PDT)

Simonla the Linchpin Section

Is this based on anything or is it supposed to be highly speculative? I'm not saying that it should go away or anything, I'm just wondering if there are any smoking guns or at least circumstantial evidence to support this view. --Singel Minory Comic (talk) 06:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • I'm kind of torn on this section in some ways. I feel like it has potential but without some kind of quote or email to link this line of thinking to Chris it seems way too speculative. Even then, it could really use a trim in terms of sheer bulk. There's a lot of ideas that could be more clearly said with less repetition and cruft. Would this really be a section about Simonla, or more about Chris's psychology?--EDit209 (talk) 00:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • I'd say it fits, but adding it as a sidenote for Chris and psychology wouldn't be a bad idea, either. But I digress, it could use a little trimming on details, or overall bulkiness.