Difference between revisions of "Talk:Star Wars"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
**Chris and Popular Culture would be better, suits both movies and TV. Also Freecell, I put the delete template up before I thought of merging it, hurp durp durp. --[[User:Thorg|Thorg]] 02:21, 5 October 2011 (PDT) | **Chris and Popular Culture would be better, suits both movies and TV. Also Freecell, I put the delete template up before I thought of merging it, hurp durp durp. --[[User:Thorg|Thorg]] 02:21, 5 October 2011 (PDT) | ||
:*Someone tried that before, that is putting all the small TV articles into one page and it moved all over the place, it was a total mess. I have similar views to Old meme, that is it's not like a huge thing with Chris but he's made several references to it and I think it warrants a page. I'd rather have a few small pages anyway than one, big, difficult to use page. Not every article has to be long.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 01:20, 7 October 2011 (PDT) | :*Someone tried that before, that is putting all the small TV articles into one page and it moved all over the place, it was a total mess. I have similar views to Old meme, that is it's not like a huge thing with Chris but he's made several references to it and I think it warrants a page. I'd rather have a few small pages anyway than one, big, difficult to use page. Not every article has to be long.--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 01:20, 7 October 2011 (PDT) | ||
::*That said, I am still going to be raging over our one sentence Seinfeld page that you insist on keeping until the day I die. --[[User:Old meme|Old meme]] 06:40, 7 October 2011 (PDT) | |||
::*I'm going to make that page to prove you wrong. After procrastinating for a while. But I'm going to make it. And I'm going to put your beloved Seinfeld article in there. --[[User:Thorg|Thorg]] 22:00, 7 October 2011 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:00, 8 October 2011
I wasn't even aware that we had enough content to start a page on Star Wars, but given that it has received a few references, I think this is justified. Certainly more so than our page on Seinfeld anyway. This will need a bit of cleanup though. --Old meme 08:00, 4 October 2011 (PDT)
- This information could easily shoved into a subsection of another article. --Thorg 23:46, 4 October 2011 (PDT)
- Maybe merge with Simpsons, Seinfeld, South Park, Gilligan's Island into the Chris and television? Eamoo 02:10, 5 October 2011 (PDT)
- Chris and Popular Culture would be better, suits both movies and TV. Also Freecell, I put the delete template up before I thought of merging it, hurp durp durp. --Thorg 02:21, 5 October 2011 (PDT)
- Someone tried that before, that is putting all the small TV articles into one page and it moved all over the place, it was a total mess. I have similar views to Old meme, that is it's not like a huge thing with Chris but he's made several references to it and I think it warrants a page. I'd rather have a few small pages anyway than one, big, difficult to use page. Not every article has to be long.--Champthom 01:20, 7 October 2011 (PDT)
- That said, I am still going to be raging over our one sentence Seinfeld page that you insist on keeping until the day I die. --Old meme 06:40, 7 October 2011 (PDT)
- I'm going to make that page to prove you wrong. After procrastinating for a while. But I'm going to make it. And I'm going to put your beloved Seinfeld article in there. --Thorg 22:00, 7 October 2011 (PDT)