Difference between revisions of "Category talk:CWCipedia vandalism"
(→Images currently up for deletion: new section) |
Little Owl (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Some images from this category were put up for deletion. Should they be kept or trashed? [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 16:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC) | Some images from this category were put up for deletion. Should they be kept or trashed? [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 16:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
:We have to do some housekeeping on the category: if it isn't relevant to the CWCki, then there is no point keeping it. Images of [[CWCipedia]] vandalism have to be recategorised to [[:Category:CWCipedia]]. --[[User:Little Owl|Little Owl]] ([[User talk:Little Owl|talk]]) 20:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:59, 3 June 2020
While I admire your thoroughness, Pfargtl9000, (seriously!) I would like to question if we really need all these pictures, and I am also pretty sure some of them are duplicates of pictures we already have.--Blachman 18:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm filtering out what we don't need, but keeping the others. A loyal Christorian like Pfargt9000 does need to be recognised. --YawningSquirtleRedux 19:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Some of the pictures the trolls are putting up are just incredible. Plus, a lot of these also qualify as Fanart.--Beat 21:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm impressed they're still coming in as fast as they are. Chris has some dedicated trolls. --YawningSquirtleRedux 21:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Some of the pictures the trolls are putting up are just incredible. Plus, a lot of these also qualify as Fanart.--Beat 21:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
I give up
Some of the shit the trolls are putting up are too obscene, even for the CWCki. See the new introduction image? Chris's duck is fine enough, but not this.
I'm doing this because it is too damn tiring, and also per CWCki:NOTED. Pfargtl9000 22:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- I did this because they started to go overboard and upload even worse shock images. Anyway, as of today, these images are slowly being deleted. Pfargtl9000 23:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
I think a cleanup is in order
How about everything in this category that is not original content gets thrown in the bin? --Blachman 13:15, 2 November 2010 (PDT)
- Yeah seriously, why was this section up in the first fucking place. seriously, whoever did this should get banned. -- Clyde 13:27, 2 November 2010 (PDT)
- Alright, who wants to keep the gay porn and whatnot? Does it really have relevance? Thoughts?--Champthom 13:41, 2 November 2010 (PDT)
- Well, I had no idea that this was here. It looks like everything needs to go, most of it is gay porn and shitty random images, there's not many original images. It'd be easier to delete all this shit. --Schuzrum Dias 19:05, 2 November 2010 (PDT)
- I am very happy to go through everything that's not an original piece of work and mark it for deletion. What's the best way to flag it for deletion, since I'm not a mod? Just write "moon plx" on the description? --Ronichu 01:41, 3 November 2010 (PDT)
Deletion
The deletion template is {{delete|reason_goes_here}}. A housecleaning is definitely in order. --Dude 01:44, 31 July 2011 (PDT)
Images currently up for deletion
Some images from this category were put up for deletion. Should they be kept or trashed? Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 16:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- We have to do some housekeeping on the category: if it isn't relevant to the CWCki, then there is no point keeping it. Images of CWCipedia vandalism have to be recategorised to Category:CWCipedia. --Little Owl (talk) 20:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)