Difference between revisions of "Talk:BABSCon"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I feel like you need to chill out with the info and analyse stuff critically. For example, the January 13 airport sighting, which you deemed fake, yet has been since proven to be legitimate. [[User:XelaBlueThunder|XelaBlueThunder]] ([[User talk:XelaBlueThunder|talk]]) 09:32, 31 March 2024 (EDT) | I feel like you need to chill out with the info and analyse stuff critically. For example, the January 13 airport sighting, which you deemed fake, yet has been since proven to be legitimate. [[User:XelaBlueThunder|XelaBlueThunder]] ([[User talk:XelaBlueThunder|talk]]) 09:32, 31 March 2024 (EDT) | ||
:Link to that sighting? Someone once faked [https://web.archive.org/web/20230116225048/https://sonichu.com/cwcki/January_2023_jail_visit a jail visit] with Chris, so I'm hoping the BABSCon stuff is real and not a repeat of that. As for the BABSCon emails, Chris's writing style and his BABSCon tweet are strong evidence, but how do we square this with what Mare Gallery tweeted? I guess it's possible the emails are real and that Mare Gallery isn't aware of it. In the only photo so far, it's being held by some guy, not hung up on a wall. [[User:Hurtful Truth Level|Hurtful Truth Level]] ([[User talk:Hurtful Truth Level|talk]]) 11:16, 31 March 2024 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:16, 31 March 2024
Fake news claim
So a Twitter user posted the pic of emails between BABSCon and Chris and wrote, "The stories about the Mare Gallery party @ #BABSCON2024 are true. They have the babs email exchange with Chris-Chan framed. They also have a naked asian nigga laying on a table that you eat off of, like the evil rich white ppl in movies do, deadass" Then The Mare Gallery replied to the tweet and said, "This is all fake news". https://twitter.com/maregallery/status/1774401605229814081 Thoughts on this? Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 07:01, 31 March 2024 (EDT)
- What is the source for the image of the framed email exchange? Personally I would say anything posted to Twitter requires independent verification from at least two reliable outside sources. JinkiesJanke (talk) 08:05, 31 March 2024 (EDT)
- The image appears to be from mcmiag, but that is the person Mare Gallery was replying to. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 08:42, 31 March 2024 (EDT)
Should we write into the BABSCon article what Mare Gallery said, and hedge things by writing "alleged emails", etc? Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 08:52, 31 March 2024 (EDT)
As the current main investigator of Christory, I know a real piece of info when I see one. First of all, the writing style of Chris is something that cannot be easily replicated by anyone. Second, Flutter being involved is a big thing. Third, this matches with March 9 post by Chris claiming BABSCon is not worth a grain of salt.
Plus, this uses the @aol.com account, not @gmail.com. This is the email Chris is still using. If you really wanted to make it a fake, you'd probably have it sent from cwcvilleguardian@gmail.com
I feel like you need to chill out with the info and analyse stuff critically. For example, the January 13 airport sighting, which you deemed fake, yet has been since proven to be legitimate. XelaBlueThunder (talk) 09:32, 31 March 2024 (EDT)
- Link to that sighting? Someone once faked a jail visit with Chris, so I'm hoping the BABSCon stuff is real and not a repeat of that. As for the BABSCon emails, Chris's writing style and his BABSCon tweet are strong evidence, but how do we square this with what Mare Gallery tweeted? I guess it's possible the emails are real and that Mare Gallery isn't aware of it. In the only photo so far, it's being held by some guy, not hung up on a wall. Hurtful Truth Level (talk) 11:16, 31 March 2024 (EDT)