Difference between revisions of "Talk:Third date"
(→To do) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Great work thus far, but anyone have a good idea where this article can go in terms of category? Really shouldn't go in the "Chris-chan" category, it's not really a CWC-ism, and it's not a very [[honest]] content sort of page, any thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 02:01, 16 November 2009 (CET) | Great work thus far, but anyone have a good idea where this article can go in terms of category? Really shouldn't go in the "Chris-chan" category, it's not really a CWC-ism, and it's not a very [[honest]] content sort of page, any thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 02:01, 16 November 2009 (CET) | ||
* Yeah, it doesn't quite seem to fit in any existing pigeonholes. Maybe calls for a "Love Quest" category? Something covering topics related to his unending search for something to fuck. [[User:Dkaien|Dkaien]] 15:24, 16 November 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 09:24, 16 November 2009
To do
Explain the rationale of the third date rule (look up what those love doctors have to say - Joyce Brown discusses this third date rule) and how Chris fails by interpreting this as a sort of law. Likewise, document all the times Chris mentions the third date rule (like in Sonichu 7).
Yes, its a bit narrow of a topic but explaining what the hell he means when he talks about the third date would be yet another thing to clarify about Chris. --Champthom 01:07, 16 November 2009 (CET)
Great work thus far, but anyone have a good idea where this article can go in terms of category? Really shouldn't go in the "Chris-chan" category, it's not really a CWC-ism, and it's not a very honest content sort of page, any thoughts? --Champthom 02:01, 16 November 2009 (CET)
- Yeah, it doesn't quite seem to fit in any existing pigeonholes. Maybe calls for a "Love Quest" category? Something covering topics related to his unending search for something to fuck. Dkaien 15:24, 16 November 2009 (CET)