Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jackie E-mails"
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Is it really accurate to describe her as such in this article? She strikes me as an excellent and very subtle troll who pushes Chris's buttons at an early stage while making it seem incidental. - [[User:Liquid!|Liquid!]] 00:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | Is it really accurate to describe her as such in this article? She strikes me as an excellent and very subtle troll who pushes Chris's buttons at an early stage while making it seem incidental. - [[User:Liquid!|Liquid!]] 00:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
: That's the vibe I'm getting, too... (I mean, come on, mistaking Asperchu for Chris's creations, when it has Alec's names all over the place? A coldly calculated berserk button press if there ever was one...) but either way, until we know for ''sure,'' it's hard to pass a definite judgment either way. Speculation isn't good until it's ''conclusive'' speculation. In my opinion, let's mention all unsubstantiated but logical theories we can think of, or mention none. =) --''[[User:Wwwwolf|wwwwolf]]'' <span style="font-size:smaller;">([[User talk:Wwwwolf|wake me when you need me]])</span> 00:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:38, 22 April 2010
1000 GET
Give or take, this should be the 1,000th CWCki article. Congratulations guys, it's you who have made the CWCki so damn great.--Champthom 04:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yay us! Also, relevant to the article, it seems like we kinda came in half way to the conversation. Was this a hook profile ad? If so, wow. Someone got through to him when many others didn't. If I can ask the author, what email of his did you mail, and where did you email from? -Ronichu 04:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- she already left a message through the community portal. Clydec 04:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks Clyde. -Ronichu 04:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Here's to 1,000 more! So is Jackie article worthy yet? Her community portal message (again) speaks volumes about how women view Chris, though I assume since this information isn't cwcanon, we'll have to wait until he makes I Need You Damian Antaria the Sequel.--AdderCress 05:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
So. He reveals the sign, the Pokemon, and the trolls all in one e-mail. Damn.--Beat 06:18, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
To do
Wikify
*Make them into level 2 headings (for easier citation of individual e-mails) [Done.] -Ronichu 08:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Categorize- Incorporate material into other articles
--Champthom 06:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
E-mail address?
Do we know which e-mail address these went to? Chris doesn't seem to reply at all from his AOL one. -Ronichu 14:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- He doesn't reply to you if you send him an e-mail to his AOL account. If you have a wet china, however...--Champthom 16:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- I figured as much, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't doing it wrong. -Ronichu 18:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Dear god.
He just rambles on and on. I love how he brings up MLW, and the names of his pokemon without any sort of provoking. It's like he can't stop himself. --Beat 16:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- He's starving for attention. I guess the YASG is not paying enough in that sector. Promises of China also helps... Griffintown 23:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Random note
I guess a funny thing is that this person has the same first name as I do. ChaosAkita 21:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
White Knight
Is it really accurate to describe her as such in this article? She strikes me as an excellent and very subtle troll who pushes Chris's buttons at an early stage while making it seem incidental. - Liquid! 00:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- That's the vibe I'm getting, too... (I mean, come on, mistaking Asperchu for Chris's creations, when it has Alec's names all over the place? A coldly calculated berserk button press if there ever was one...) but either way, until we know for sure, it's hard to pass a definite judgment either way. Speculation isn't good until it's conclusive speculation. In my opinion, let's mention all unsubstantiated but logical theories we can think of, or mention none. =) --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 00:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)